Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060232›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2022

Rapid Molecular Assays for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Louansha Nandlal, Rubeshan Perumal, Kogieleum Naidoo

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rapid drug resistance prediction in positiveEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Precision Medicine Strategies to Improve Isoniazid Therapy in Patients with Tuberculosis.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2024
    Review
  19. Novel automated AIMLAM for diagnosis ofFuture microbiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louansha Nandlal *Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC)-CAPRISA-TB-HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, University of KwaZulu-Natal Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, South Africa.
Rubeshan Perumal *Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC)-CAPRISA-TB-HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, University of KwaZulu-Natal Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8892-2904
Kogieleum Naidoo *Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC)-CAPRISA-TB-HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, University of KwaZulu-Natal Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recognition that drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) poses a major threat to global tuberculosis (TB) control efforts has catalysed the development of new and urgently needed TB diagnostics. The full beneficial impact of the subsequent flood of new TB diagnostic tests into the market can only be realised if these diagnostic tests are readily accessible to TB programs and contribute to improved patient outcomes. Although phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing remains the gold standard, an improved understanding of the relationship between mutations and different levels of drug resistance coupled with the advantages of molecular diagnostics could result in rapid molecular diagnostic tests replacing phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing. Successful diagnostics need to diagnose all forms of drug-resistant TB prevalent in each geographic region. Given the finite number and often limited availability of effective drugs for DR-TB, the diagnostic test must be able to detect all clinically important types of resistance to available anti-TB drugs. However, less comprehensive resistance profiling may be sufficient in settings where extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) and pre-XDR are absent. Rapid molecular diagnostic tests for DR-TB detection suitable for DR-TB endemic settings should be accurate, inexpensive, suitable to be performed on an easily accessible sample, detect prevalent circulating drug-resistant strains, and provide results within a short turnaround time to enable timely treatment initiation. In this review, we appraise the wide range of molecular diagnostics for DR-TB endorsed by the World Health Organisation, discuss the challenges in the development and rollout of rapid molecular DR-TB tests in low- and middle-income countries, and highlight user perspectives and cost-effectiveness factors that influence their utility.

Indexed as

diagnosisdrug resistancemolecular assayspoint of caretuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36060232
PMCPMC9438776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.