Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060196›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2022

Cost-effectiveness of varying degrees and models of therapist-assisted transdiagnostic internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial.

H Guliani, J Witt, V Peynenburg, A Wilhelms, M Nugent, B F Dear, N Titov, H D Hadjistavropoulos

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

H Guliani3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Economics, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
J Witt15 Chancellors Circle, Department of Economics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V5, Canada.
V Peynenburg3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
A Wilhelms3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
M Nugent3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
B F DeareCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
N TitovMindSpot Clinic, eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
H D Hadjistavropoulos3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In routine care, Internet-delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (ICBT) is often delivered with therapist support via emails/phone calls, but the cost-effectiveness of varying amounts of therapist support or having therapists specialized in ICBT is not known. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of specialized therapists providing ICBT support once-weekly (1WS) versus providing support once-weekly supplemented with a one-business-day response to patient emails (1W/1BD-S). We further compared the cost-effectiveness of 1W support offered by therapists employed in a specialized clinic (1WS) versus community clinics where therapists primarily deliver face-to-face therapy (1WC). Patients were randomly allocated to groups: 1WS group (

Indexed as

Cognitive behaviour therapyCost-effectiveness analysisInternet-deliveredTherapist supportTransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID36060196
PMCPMC9428814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.