Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060181›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology2022

Nationwide impact of COVID-19 pandemic on postgraduate medical teaching, research, and mental stress: A cross-sectional online questionnaire-based survey.

Anju Gupta, Damarla Haritha, Rashmi Ramachandran, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Gudela Mohan Sai, Geetanjali Chikoti, Nishkarsh Gupta, Rajeev Kumar Malhotra, G S Kaloiya, Anjan Trikha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and medical education: Pros and cons.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anju GuptaAnaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Damarla HarithaAnaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Rashmi RamachandranAnaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Rajeshwari SubramaniamAnaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Gudela Mohan SaiAnaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Geetanjali ChikotiAnesthesiology, GTB and UCMS, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Nishkarsh GuptaDepartment of Onco-Anesthesiology and Palliative Medicine, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Rajeev Kumar MalhotraDelhi Cancer Registry, DRBRAIRCH, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
G S KaloiyaDepartment of Psychiatry, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Anjan TrikhaAnaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, NDDTC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected postgraduate medical education, training, and ongoing research work across specialties. Our survey aimed to analyze the effect of COVID-19 on challenges in pursuing research and academics and ascertain the stressors on residents across medical specialties. Material and Methods: The questionnaire was validated by 10 experts and following ethical approval, this google form-based survey was circulated to postgraduates across specialties across the country through social media platforms over 1 month (22 August 2020 to 21 September 2020). On clicking the link, the participants received brief information regarding the survey followed by the questionnaire. Weekly reminders were sent to the nonresponders till the desired sample size was attained, after which the survey was closed, and responses were analyzed. Results: Four hundred and nineteen of 900 residents completed the survey (46.6% response rate). Majority (88.8%) admitted that the inability to conduct the thesis and break in academics caused a significant amount of mental stress upon them. Though classes had resumed through online platforms for most residents (75.4%), the residents reported that lack of bedside learning (65.4%), inadequate progress tests (26.4%), and delay in thesis topic allotment (84.6% among those not allotted thesis) correlated with increased stress. Fear of extension of the course (53%; P = 0.019) and getting infected with COVID-19 (46.6%; P = 0.019) were most cited reasons for significant stress in most of the residents. Many residents (26%) were unable to sleep properly and 22.1% were unable to concentrate on academics. Majority believed that extension of the submission deadline, reduction in sample size, and change in topic would help to complete thesis. Conclusion: The present survey revealed that there is a major impediment to research and academics of medical postgraduates during COVID-19 pandemic which has markedly increased their stress levels.

Indexed as

Anxiety disordersCOVID-19educationgraduatelearningsample sizesleep

Identifiers

PMID36060181
PMCPMC9438838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.