Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060140›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

Characterization of an Endophytic Antagonistic Bacterial Strain

Jun-Lian Gao, Mohammad Sayyar Khan, Yu-Chen Sun, Jing Xue, Yunpeng Du, Chunhong Yang, Vladimir K Chebotar, Vladimir S Tikunov, Ivan N Rubanov, Xuqing Chen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Biocontrol of Seedborne Fungi on Small-Grained Cereals UsingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Reflections on microbial genetic resources in agricultural systems.Current research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jun-Lian GaoInstitute of Grassland, Flowers and Ecology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-1513
Mohammad Sayyar KhanMicrobiology Division, Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (IBGE), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-6222
Yu-Chen SunInstitute of Grassland, Flowers and Ecology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Jing XueInstitute of Grassland, Flowers and Ecology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2826-3120
Yunpeng DuInstitute of Grassland, Flowers and Ecology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-1309
Chunhong YangInstitute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing-100093, China.
Vladimir K ChebotarAll-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, St. Petersburg, Pushkin-8, 196608, Russia.
Vladimir S TikunovLomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Geography, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ivan N RubanovLomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Geography, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Xuqing ChenInstitute of Grassland, Flowers and Ecology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6354-5081
Xiuhai ZhangInstitute of Grassland, Flowers and Ecology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7854-6287
Institute of Grassland Research · CNLomonosov Moscow State University · RUAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology · RUChinese Academy of Sciences · CNThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial inoculants are an important tool for increasing arable land productivity and decreasing mineral fertilizer application. This study was aimed at isolating and identifying endophytic antagonistic bacteria from lily (

Indexed as

LiliumAscomycotaBacillusBacteriaBotrytisFusariumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID36060140
PMCPMC9436562
OpenAlexW4293072663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.