Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060022›Full record

ReviewCancer diagnosis & prognosis

The Significance of Peritoneal Washing as a Prognostic Indicator for Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Christina Christou, Sevasti-Effraimia Krouskou, Antonios Koutras, Thomas Ntounis, Zacharias Fasoulakis, Asimina Valsamaki, Vasilios Pergialiotis, Sotirios Sotiriou, Kyriakos Konis, Panagiotis Symeonidis and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christina ChristouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Sevasti-Effraimia KrouskouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Antonios Koutras1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', Athens, Greece.
Thomas Ntounis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', Athens, Greece.
Zacharias Fasoulakis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', Athens, Greece.
Asimina ValsamakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Larisa, Larissa, Greece.
Vasilios PergialiotisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Sotirios SotiriouDepartment of Embryology, University Hospital of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Kyriakos KonisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Arta, Arta, Greece.
Panagiotis SymeonidisUniversity General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Athina A SamaraDepartment of Embryology, University Hospital of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Athanasios PagkalosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Xanthi, Xanthi, Greece.
Athanasios ChionisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laiko General hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgios Daskalakis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', Athens, Greece.
Emmanuel N KontomanolisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimDuring ovarian cancer (OC) debulking surgery, the surgeon can examine the peritoneal cavity for malignant cancer cells with peritoneal washing (PW) cytology. The goal of this study was to examine the significance of peritoneal washing as a prognostic indicator for ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsInformation considering the prognostic factors of OC and their impact in PW's result was collected, compared, and combined.

resultsOmental metastasis, tumor type, tumor invasion, tumor size, tumor grade/ stage, tumor's cytoreduction, and recurrence affect both the peritoneal washing result and the patient's prognosis. The correlation that most of the above factors have with a positive PW and dismal prognosis, led us to the assumption that PW has a significance as a prognostic indicator.

conclusionThe significance of PW as a prognostic indicator remains an assumption.

Indexed as

debulking surgeryOvarian cancerperitoneal metastasisperitoneal washing

Identifiers

PMID36060022
PMCPMC9425574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.