Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059837›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Characterizing pharmacogenetic programs using the consolidated framework for implementation research: A structured scoping review.

John H McDermott, Stuart Wright, Videha Sharma, William G Newman, Katherine Payne, Paul Wilson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing in the acute hospital setting: a cross-sectional study.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cardiovascular precision medicine - A pharmacogenomic perspective.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. The Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in the United Kingdom.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John H McDermottManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Stuart WrightDivision of Population Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Videha SharmaDivision of Informatics, Centre for Health Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
William G NewmanManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Katherine PayneDivision of Population Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Paul WilsonDivision of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several healthcare organizations have developed pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing programs, where testing is undertaken prior to the prescription of a medicine. This review characterizes the barriers and facilitators which influenced the development of these programs. A bidirectional citation searching strategy identified relevant publications before a standardized data extraction approach was applied. Publications were grouped by program and data synthesis was undertaken using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). 104 publications were identified from 40 programs and 4 multi-center initiatives. 26 (66%) of the programs were based in the United States and 95% in high-income countries. The programs were heterogeneous in their design and scale. The Characteristics of the Intervention, Inner Setting, and Process domains were referenced by 92.5, 80, and 77.5% of programs, respectively. A positive institutional culture, leadership engagement, engaging stakeholders, and the use of clinical champions were frequently described as facilitators to implementation. Clinician self-efficacy, lack of stakeholder knowledge, and the cost of the intervention were commonly cited barriers. Despite variation between the programs, there were several similarities in approach which could be categorized

Indexed as

implementation sciencemedical informaticspharmacogeneticspharmacogenomicsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID36059837
PMCPMC9433561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.