Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059825›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2022

Modeling digital health systems to foster interoperability.

Frank Oemig, Bernd Blobel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank OemigIT-Consultant in Healthcare, Mülheim, Germany.
Bernd BlobelMedical Faculty, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information systems are a complex thing, and they are mostly not used stand-alone anymore. In that context, many different issues must be considered. It starts with defining the system's purpose, includes the use cases and scenarios in combination with the necessary data ideally separated into distinct domains. Furthermore, it requires the selection of an appropriate set of supporting components/tools and a development environment including some technology to enable continuous integration. And the endeavor does not come to an end with the development of the system itself. To manage those challenges, thinking about design and architectural principles becomes a mandatory element. The situation gets more complicated with growing expectations regarding communication and cooperation between the more and more complex and dynamic ecosystem's actors. The resulting information system has to adhere to different, sometimes contradictory principles and requirements, frequently controlled by different authorities. This paper focuses less on developing information systems in general but concentrates on the aspects that must be considered when multiple requirements from different stakeholders for data exchange and knowledge sharing for advanced interoperability must be met. The latter is commonly underspecified due to missing proper verification of the correct interpretation of data. One intent of the paper is to promote the deployment of information models as a common basis to derive data exchange specifications establishing advanced interoperability. However, it also addresses the necessity to guarantee that the information models and implementable artifacts correctly represent the intended functions and objectives as well as the underlying concepts of the business system in its prevailing context. Therefore, we cannot limit our considerations on the data and information viewpoints.

Indexed as

communication standarddata exchangedata setinformation modelinteroperability

Identifiers

PMID36059825
PMCPMC9437518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.