Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059803›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2022

Competitive Risk Model for Specific Mortality Prediction in Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study with Machine Learning.

Hao Su, Xiaoqiang Xue, Yutao Wang, Yi Lu, Chengquan Ma, Zhigang Ji, Xiaozhe Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hao SuDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Xiaoqiang XueDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Yutao WangDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Yi LuDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Chengquan MaDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhigang JiDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5236-5058
Xiaozhe SuDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Noncancer death accounts for a high proportion of all patients with bladder cancer, while these patients are often excluded from the survival analysis, which increases the selection bias of the study subjects in the prediction model. Methods: Clinicopathological information of bladder cancer patients was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and the patients were categorized at random into the training and validation cohorts. The random forest method was used to calculate the importance of clinical variables in the training cohort. Multivariate and univariate analyses were undertaken to assess the risk indicators, and the prediction nomogram based on the competitive risk model was constructed. The model's performance was evaluated utilizing the calibration curve, consistency index (C index), and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Results: In total, we enrolled 39285 bladder cancer patients in the study (27500 patients were allotted to the training cohort, whereas 11785 were allotted to the validation cohort). A competitive risk model was constructed to predict bladder cancer-specific mortality. The overall C index of patients in the training cohort was 0.876, and the AUC values were 0.891, 0.871, and 0.853, correspondingly, for 1-, 3-, and 5-year cancer-specific mortality. On the other hand, the overall C index of patients in the validation cohort was 0.877, and the AUC values were 0.894, 0.870, and 0.847 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year correspondingly, suggesting a remarkable predictive performance of the model. Conclusions: The competitive risk model proved to be of great accuracy and reliability and could help clinical decision-makers improve their management and approaches for managing bladder cancer patients.

Identifiers

PMID36059803
PMCPMC9436601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.