ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2022
Blood lipid levels and treatment following an acute coronary syndrome or coronary intervention - Journey from hospital to cardiac rehabilitation.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dysregulation of Serum miR-212-3p Serves as a Biomarker to Predict Disease Onset and Short-Term Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Improving outcomes in acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of home-based compared to hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation and usual care: 3-4 months (end of the program) and 9-10 months (6 months after the end of the program).American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
- Exercise Training and Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Comprehensive Assessment and Prescription.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A significant number of coronary artery disease patients do not attain guideline recommended LDL levels. Participating in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program has been shown to improve adherence to medical therapy. Objectives: Evaluate the specific lipid lowering therapy (LLT) prescribed and percent of subjects achieving LDL levels of <70 mg/dL before and after 3 months following CR program initiation. Methods: From May 2017 to April 2019, we prospectively recruited patients referred to our CR program and compared 1015 of them at 4 time points; (P1) just prior to the index hospitalization, (P2) during the index hospitalization, (P3) upon entering the CR program, roughly 3 months after the index hospitalization, and (P4) 3 months into the CR program. Included in the analysis were parameters of lipid levels, the dispensed medication given, as well as patient adherence to treatment. Conclusions: A significant treatment gap is present even in a selected population participating in CR, with the vast majority receiving guideline recommended LLT. In order to improve goals, we need to intensify LLT treatment, and increase patient adherence to therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.