ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Predicting recurrence and metastasis risk of endometrial carcinoma
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women with first recurrence of endometrial cancer: who are they? An analysis of real-world data of the JAGO/NOGGO.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Multi-omics analysis revealed the addiction to glutamine and susceptibility to de novo lipogenesis of endometrial neoplasm.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is one of the three major gynecological malignancies, in which 15% - 20% patients will have recurrence and metastasis. Though there are many studies on the prognosis on this cancer, the performances of existing models evaluating the risk of its recurrence and metastasis are yet to be improved. In addition, a comprehensive multi-omics analyses on the prognostic signatures of EC are on demand. In this study, we aimed to construct a relatively stable and reliable model for predicting recurrence and metastasis of EC. This will help determine the risk level of patients and choose appropriate adjuvant therapy, thereby avoiding improper treatment, and improving the prognosis of patients. Methods: The mRNA, microRNA (miRNA), long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), copy number variation (CNV) data and clinical information of patients with EC were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differential expression analyses were performed between the recurrence or metastasis group and the non-recurrence/metastasis group. Then, we screened potential prognostic markers from the four kinds of omics data respectively and established prediction models using three classifiers. Results: We achieved differential expressed mRNAs, lncRNAs, miRNAs and CNVs between the two groups. According to feature selection scores by the random forest algorithm, 275 CNV features, 50 lncRNA features, 150 miRNA features and 150 mRNA features were selected, respectively. And the prediction model constructed by the features of lncRNA data using random forest method showed the best performance, with an area under the curve of 0.763, and an accuracy of 0.819 under 10-fold cross-validation. Conclusion: We developed a computational model using omics information, which is able to predicting recurrence and metastasis risk of EC accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.