Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059663›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Safety and immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with breast and gynecological cancer on active anticancer therapy: Results of a prospective observational study.

Pietro De Placido, Erica Pietroluongo, Carmine De Angelis, Margherita Tafuro, Chiara Barraco, Rosa Giannatiempo, Roberto Buonaiuto, Francesco Schettini, Anna Iervolino, Emilia Anna Vozzella and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. mRNA Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2: Advantages and Caveats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pietro De PlacidoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Erica PietroluongoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Carmine De AngelisDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Margherita TafuroDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Chiara BarracoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Rosa GiannatiempoOspedale Evangelico Betania, Department of Pathology, Naples, Italy.
Roberto BuonaiutoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Francesco SchettiniMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna IervolinoDirezione Generale, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Emilia Anna VozzellaDirezione Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Mario GiulianoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Roberto BiancoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Grazia ArpinoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are highly effective. Nevertheless, immunocompromised participants were excluded from randomized controlled clinical trials. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 (BNT162b2) vaccine in patients with breast and gynecological cancer treated with active anticancer therapy versus a control cohort of healthy participants. Methods: Immune responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with breast cancer ( Results: Overall, 43/50 (86%) patients of the cancer cohort (74% in the breast cancer group and 100% in the gynecological malignancy group) developed IgG antibodies after the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. There were no statistically significant differences in responder rates between patients treated with chemotherapy and those on target therapy. The majority of patients who received chemotherapy with or without target therapy, 21/28 (75%), developed a reliable antibody titer after a vaccine. All seven non-responder patients were undergoing an anthracycline-based regimen. Based on IgG levels (0-400 AU/ml), patients were classified as negative ('non-responders'), weakly positive, or strongly positive ('responders'). No delay in cancer therapy schedule or reported side effects were recorded after BNT162b2 vaccine administration. All healthy participants were strongly positive. Responder rates differed significantly between the two study cohorts (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Most patients develop antibody titers after the second immunization. However, given the persistence of non-responders or weak responders, additional immunization booster seems to be required, along with proactive planning in the vaccination schedule, with vaccine administration spaced out over time with respect to chemotherapy.

Indexed as

BNT162b2breast cancerchemotherapyCOVID - 19COVID vaccineimmunogenicityneutralizing antibody titerstarget therapies

Identifiers

PMID36059663
PMCPMC9437636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.