Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059654›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.

Ying Liu, Qingqing Ge, Shuning Xu, Ke Li, Ying Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. [Ferroptosis suppressor genes are highly expressed in esophageal cancer to inhibit tumor cell ferroptosis].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Qingqing GeDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuning XuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ke LiDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Both anlotinib and programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade have been approved for the second-line treatment of metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the combination of these two therapies has not been evaluated. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting tumor angiogenesis, combined with PD-1 blockade as second or further-line treatment for advanced ESCC. Methods: Between January 2019 and February 2021, 98 advanced ESCC patients receiving anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade or anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment at Henan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade were grouped as cohort A (n=48), while those receiving anlotinib monotherapy were grouped as cohort B (n=50). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and toxicity. Furthermore, independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Data was collected until May 1, 2021, with a median follow-up time of 9.30 months (8.23-10.37 months) in cohort A and11.10months (7.82-14.38 months) in cohort B. For patients with advanced ESCC, cohort A resulted in significantly longer PFS (5.40 vs. 3.00 months, P<0.001) and higher DCR (71.7% vs. 47.9%, P=0.019) than cohort B. The ORR indicated no significant difference between cohort A (23.9%) and cohort B (10.4%) (P=0.082). Adverse reactions were mainly grade1/2 in the two groups. Compared with cohort B, a significantly higher rate of grade 1-2 hypothyroidism was observed in patients in cohort A (P= 0.034). Three patients (6.3%) developed grade 1/2 immune-related pneumonia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the drug regimen (P<0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (P=0.002), distant organ metastasis (P=0.008), and metastatic sites (P=0.032) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Conclusions: Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade showed promising anti-tumor activity and manageable toxicity as second or further-line treatment of advanced ESCC.

Indexed as

anlotinibefficacy and safetyesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)programmed death-1 blockade (anti-PD-1)tumor immune microenvironment (TIME)

Identifiers

PMID36059654
PMCPMC9428701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.