Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059629›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

Prognostic role of the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ke Zhou, Jie Cao, Huahang Lin, Linchuan Liang, Zhongzhong Shen, Lei Wang, Zhiyu Peng, Jiandong Mei

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic Value of Acoustic Analysis and Inflammation Markers in Pediatric Vocal Fold Nodules.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A nomogram for predicting cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer patients from a nursing science precision health model perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ke ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie CaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Huahang LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Linchuan LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhongzhong ShenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhiyu PengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jiandong MeiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It remains controversial whether the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) serves as a potential indicator for the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to address this concern. Methods: Up to March 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to retrieve potentially eligible articles. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the relationship between PLR and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS), while the combined odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated to evaluate the relationship between PLR and the objective response rate (ORR) as well as the disease control rate (DCR). Subgroup analyses were further performed to detect the source of heterogeneity and potential predictive value of PLR in different groups in terms of OS and PFS. Results: A total of 21 included studies involving 2312 patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy were included. The combined results suggested that elevated PLR was associated with poorer OS (HR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.87-2.68; I² =44%; P=0.01) and PFS (HR=1.66; 95% CI: 1.36-2.04; I² =64%; P<0.01). Furthermore, elevated PLR showed a lower ORR (OR= 0.61; 95% CI: 0.43-0.87, I²=20%; P=0.29) and DCR (OR= 0.44; 95% CI: 0.27-0.72, I²=61%; P=0.02). In subgroup analyses, pretreatment PLR was significantly associated with adverse OS and PFS. The same results were observed in different PLRs in terms of cutoff value (>200 vs. ≤200). Furthermore, high PLR was significantly associated with poor OS and PFS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, PLR was not associated with OS and PFS in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In addition, PLR predicted poor OS irrespective of regions and types of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Conclusion: On the whole, patients with low PLR had better OS and PFS, as well as higher ORR and DCR when receiving immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer especially for advanced NSCLC. And further investigations are warranted to confirm the prognostic value of PLR in advanced SCLC. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022315976.

Indexed as

advanced lung cancerbiomarkerimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunotherapymeta-analysisplatelet to lymphocyte ratioprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36059629
PMCPMC9437586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.