Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059577›Full record

ArticleEngineering applications of artificial intelligence2022

Investigation of the pharmaceutical warehouse locations under COVID-19-A case study for Duzce, Turkey.

Melike Erdogan, Ertugrul Ayyildiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melike ErdoganDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Duzce University, 81620, Duzce, Turkey.
Ertugrul AyyildizDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmaceutical warehouses are among the centers that play a critical role in the delivery of medicines from the producers to the consumers. Especially with the new drugs and vaccines added during the pandemic period to the supply chain, the importance of the regions they are located in has increased critically. Since the selection of pharmaceutical warehouse location is a strategic decision, it should be handled in detail and a comprehensive analysis should be made for the location selection process. Considering all these, in this study, a real-case application by taking the problem of selecting the best location for a pharmaceutical warehouse is carried out for a city that can be seen as critical in drug distribution in Turkey. For this aim, two effective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), are integrated under spherical fuzzy environment to reflect fuzziness and indeterminacy better in the decision-making process and the pharmaceutical warehouse location selection problem is discussed by the proposed fuzzy integrated methodology for the first time. Finally, the best region is found for the pharmaceutical warehouse and the results are discussed under the determined criteria. A detailed robustness analysis is also conducted to measure the validity, sensibility and effectiveness of the proposed methodology. With this study, it can be claimed that literature has initiated to be revealed for the pharmaceutical warehouse location problem and a guide has been put forward for those who are willing to study this area.

Indexed as

Analytic hierarchy processEvaluation based on distance from average solutionPandemicsPharmaceutical warehouse locationSpherical fuzzy sets

Identifiers

PMID36059577
PMCPMC9420725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.