ArticleEmergency medicine international2022
Effectiveness and Safety Analysis of Plasma Beam in the Treatment of Facial Depressed Scars.
Article in Emergency medicine international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Effectiveness and Safety Analysis of Plasma Beam in the Treatment of Facial Depressed Scars.Emergency medicine international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-01-24Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of microplasma beam in the treatment of facial depression scars. Methods: 106 patients with facial depression scars treated in the hospital between January 2017 and September 2021 were selected as the observation subjects. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into the control group (receiving ultrapulsed carbon dioxide lattice laser treatment, Results: A clinical effective rate of 94.55% in the observation group was higher than a clinical effective rate of 82.35% in the control group ( Conclusion: Plasma beam has a significant efficacy in the treatment of facial depressed scars, and it has mild pain, quick recovery, and high safety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.