SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy for stage II-III muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy-containing regimens compared with chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Single-cell transcriptomics identifies key immune-suppressive cells and their driver genes in the bladder cancer microenvironment with prognostic implications.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Choosing neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer based on efficacy-safety trade-off: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant disitamab vedotin (RC-48) plus a PD-1 inhibitor in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter real-world study with stratification by HER2 expression and tertiary lymphoid structures.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- The Management of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2025Review
- HLA-I genotype landscape in lung cancer and its prognosis value in Chinese small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Chemoimmunotherapy synergism: mechanisms and clinical applications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Current Role and Future Frontiers of Spatial Transcriptomics in Genitourinary Cancers.Cancers · 2025Review
- Neoadjuvant treatment patterns and biomarker selection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- FAM174B remodels the tumor microenvironment, inhibits the infiltration of macrophage, predicts the molecular subtype and therapeutic response of bladder cancer.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Identification of inflammation related gene signatures for bladder cancer prognosis prediction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Blautia coccoides and its metabolic products enhance the efficacy of bladder cancer immunotherapy by promoting CD8Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Curcumin-Dichloroacetate Hybrid Molecule as an Antitumor Oral Drug against Multidrug-Resistant Advanced Bladder Cancers.Cancers · 2024Article
- A narrative review of management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer perioperative period: will continuous and combined treatment be the new trend?Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Tislelizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin as a neoadjuvant regimen for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- How Do Molecular Classifications Affect the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma?Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024Review
- Advancing bladder cancer management: development of a prognostic model and personalized therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- PLAGL2 promotes bladder cancer progression via RACGAP1/RhoA GTPase/YAP1 signaling.Cell death & disease · 2023Article
- Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Rare Malignancy with Distinct Immuno-Genomic Features in the Era of Precision-Based Therapies.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- An innovative model based on N7-methylguanosine-related lncRNAs for forecasting prognosis and tumor immune landscape in bladder cancer.Cancer cell international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Considering the striking evidence revealed by immunotherapy in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer, investigators have explored neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Currently, there have been a large number of studies reporting varied efficacy and safety of these approaches. Herein, we pooled the available evidence in terms of oncological outcomes (pathological complete response [pCR] and pathological partial response [pPR]) and safety outcomes (immune-related adverse events [irAEs], treatment-related adverse events [TRAEs]), through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting abstracts to identify relevant studies up to June 2022. Studies were included if they evaluated the neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in MIBC and reported at least the pCR. Results: A total of 22 records involving 843 patients were included. For pCR of immunotherapy, the pooled rate of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and dual-ICIs therapy was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.3% - 32.8%) and 32.1% (95%CI: 20.6% - 43.7%), respectively. For pCR of chemoimmunotherapy, the overall pooled rate was 42.6% (95% CI: 34.9% - 50.2%). Subgroup of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) plus ICI had a pCR rate of 41.7% (95%CI: 35.8% - 47.5%). In terms of safety, the pooled rate of Grade≥3 irAEs was 11.7% (95% CI: 6.5%-16.9%). In subgroup analysis, the Grade≥3 irAEs rate of ICI monotherapy, dual-ICIs therapy, and GC plus ICI therapy was 7.4% (95% CI: 4.3%-10.5%), 30.3% (95% CI: 15.3%-45.3%), and 14.5% (95% CI: 3.5% - 25.4%), respectively. Besides, the pooled Grade≥3 TRAEs rate for chemoimmunotherapy was 32.4% (95% CI: 13.1% - 51.6%). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy were effective and safe in the treatment of MIBC. Compared to ICI monotherapy, dual-ICIs therapy or chemoimmunotherapy can improve the response rate, while increasing the morbidity of Grade≥ 3 irAEs or Grade≥ 3 TRAEs. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD4202233771.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.