Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059395›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Apache Spark and Deep Learning Models for High-Performance Network Intrusion Detection Using CSE-CIC-IDS2018.

Abdulnaser A Hagar, Bharti W Gawali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdulnaser A HagarFaculty of Administrative and Computer Sciences, Albaydha University, Albaydha, Yemen.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3351-0966
Bharti W GawaliDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8353-5849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keeping computers secure is becoming challenging as networks grow and new network-based technologies emerge. Cybercriminals' attack surface expands with the release of new internet-enabled products. As many cyberattacks affect businesses' confidentiality, availability, and integrity, network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) show an essential role. Network-based intrusion detection uses datasets like CSE-CIC-IDS2018 to train prediction models. With fourteen types of attacks included, the latest big data set for intrusion detection is available to the public. This work proposes three models, two deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and Apache Spark, to improve the detection of all types of attacks. To reduce the dimensionality, random forests (RF) was employed to select the important features; it gave 19 from 84 features. The dataset is imbalanced; thus, oversampling and undersampling techniques reduce the imbalance ratio. The Apache Spark model produced the best results across all 15 classes, with accuracy as high as 100% for all classes, as seen by the experiments' findings. For the

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID36059395
PMCPMC9439899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.