Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059121›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Assessing potential brief screening questions for use within different social care-related contexts to identify individuals experiencing gambling-related harms: A scoping review.

Cat Forward, Caroline Norrie, Stephanie Bramley, Heather Wardle, Glenn Stewart, Wesley Dowridge, Steven Nyandu, Jaana Parker, James Shearer, Emily Finch and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cat ForwardKing's College London, London, UK.
Caroline NorrieKing's College London, London, UK.
Stephanie BramleyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Heather WardleUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1361-3706
Glenn StewartLondon Borough of Enfield, London, UK.
Wesley DowridgePeople with Lived Experience (PWLE) Representative, BetKnowMore, London, UK.
Steven NyanduBetKnowMore, London, UK.
Jaana ParkerPeople with Lived Experience (PWLE) Representative, BetKnowMore, London, UK.
James ShearerKing's College London, London, UK.
Emily FinchKing's College London, London, UK.
Jill ManthorpeKing's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gambling-related harms are increasingly recognised as public health concerns internationally. One response is to improve identification of and support for those affected by gambling-related harms, including individuals who gamble and those close to them, 'affected others'. Adult social care services have been identified as a setting in which screening for gambling-related harms is suitable and desirable. To achieve this, a tool is required which can identify gambling-related harms experienced by individuals and affected others. This scoping review aimed to identify whether any brief (i.e. three questions or less) screening tools are being used and, if so, how brief screening for gambling-related harm is being implemented in health and social care-related contexts. An international English language scoping review of research and grey literature was undertaken between April and July 2021. The search included single-item and brief screening tools which have been developed to identify gambling-related harms for individuals and affected others across a range of health and social care-related contexts. Findings show that screening tools for gambling-related harms have been developed for use in health settings rather than in social care contexts. For example within gambling, mental health or substance misuse support services. We found no evidence of a brief or single-item screening tool for identifying harms to individuals and affected others which is of adequate quality to strongly recommend for use in an adult social care setting. Development of a validated brief or single-item screening tool is recommended to assist adult social care practitioners to effectively screen, identify, support and signpost people affected by gambling-related harms.

Indexed as

GamblingAdultHumansPublic HealthRisk FactorsSocial Supportadult social caregambling-related harmshealth promotionpathological gamblingpublic healthscoping reviewscreening

Identifiers

PMID36059121
PMCPMC10087363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.