Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36058935›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2022

In vitro and in vivo differences in neurovirulence between D614G, Delta And Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Lisa Bauer, Melanie Rissmann, Feline F W Benavides, Lonneke Leijten, Peter van Run, Lineke Begeman, Edwin J B Veldhuis Kroeze, Bas Lendemeijer, Hilde Smeenk, Femke M S de Vrij and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. AnnCovDB: a manually curated annotation database for mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The neurobiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The role of immune activation and antigen persistence in acute and long COVID.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa Bauer *Department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Melanie Rissmann *Department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Feline F W BenavidesDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lonneke LeijtenDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter van RunDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lineke BegemanDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Edwin J B Veldhuis KroezeDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas LendemeijerDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hilde SmeenkDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Femke M S de VrijDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Steven A KushnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marion P G KoopmansDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Barry RockxDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Debby van RielDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. d.vanriel@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-3564
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with various neurological complications. Although the mechanism is not fully understood, several studies have shown that neuroinflammation occurs in the acute and post-acute phase. As these studies have predominantly been performed with isolates from 2020, it is unknown if there are differences among SARS-CoV-2 variants in their ability to cause neuroinflammation. Here, we compared the neuroinvasiveness, neurotropism and neurovirulence of the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain D614G, the Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron BA.1 (B.1.1.529) variants using in vitro and in vivo models. The Omicron BA.1 variant showed reduced neurotropism and neurovirulence compared to Delta and D614G in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cortical neurons co-cultured with astrocytes. Similar differences were obtained in Syrian hamsters inoculated with D614G, Delta and the Omicron BA.1 variant 5 days post infection. Replication in the olfactory mucosa was observed in all hamsters, but most prominently in D614G inoculated hamsters. Furthermore, neuroinvasion into the CNS via the olfactory nerve was observed in D614G, but not Delta or Omicron BA.1 inoculated hamsters. Furthermore, neuroinvasion was associated with neuroinflammation in the olfactory bulb of hamsters inoculated with D614G. Altogether, our findings suggest differences in the neuroinvasive, neurotropic and neurovirulent potential between SARS-CoV-2 variants using in vitro hiPSC-derived neural cultures and in vivo in hamsters during the acute phase of the infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsCricetinaeHumansMesocricetusSARS-CoV-2Brain olfactory bulbCoronavirusCOVID-19InterferonMicroglia activationNeuroinvasionNeurotropismNeurovirulenceSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36058935
PMCPMC9441226
OpenAlexW4294669030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.