Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36058925›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2022

Concentrated transdiagnostic and cross-disciplinary group treatment for patients with depression and with anxiety: a pilot study.

Gerd Kvale, Ane Wilhelmsen-Langeland, Marte Jürgensen, Sigurd William Hystad, Lars-Göran Öst, Eirik Søfteland, Tore Børtveit

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05234281 (Concentrated Cross-disciplinary Group Intervention for Common Health Complaints), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05234281 naunknown statusnot on this map

Concentrated Cross-disciplinary Group Intervention for Common Health Complaints (Mixed Anxiety Depression, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Low Back Pain, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Post COVID-19 Fatigue)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelse i HardangerRan2021 to 2024Enrolled1,000ConditionsMixed Anxiety Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Low Back Pain, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsInterdisciplincary concentrated group rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerd KvaleHaukeland University Hospital, Bergen Division of Mental Health, 5021, Bergen, Norway. gerd.kvale@helse-bergen.no.
Ane Wilhelmsen-LangelandHaukeland University Hospital, Bergen Division of Mental Health, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Marte JürgensenHaukeland University Hospital, Bergen Division of Mental Health, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Sigurd William HystadDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Lars-Göran ÖstDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eirik SøftelandHelse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway.
Tore BørtveitHaukeland University Hospital, Bergen Division of Mental Health, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOStockholm University · SESykehuset i Vestfold · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of treatment approaches have shown efficacy for depression and/or anxiety, yet there is a paucity of research on potentially cost-effective concentrated approaches. Based on our previous experience with concentrated treatment in disorders such as Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and chronic fatigue, we proposed that this novel approach could be useful for other conditions, including depression and/or anxiety. As a pre-requisite for a future randomized controlled trial, the aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability, satisfaction and effectiveness of a transdiagnostic, interdisciplinary group treatment delivered during 5 consecutive days to groups of 6-10 patients with depression and/or anxiety.

methodsThis was a non-randomized clinical intervention pilot study in line with a published protocol. Forty-two consecutively referred patients, aged 19-47 (mean age 31.7, SD = 8.12) were included and completed treatment. All had a severity of their problems that entitled them to care in the specialist public mental health care. Self-reported age when the symptoms became a problem was 20.9 years. Mean number of prior treatment courses was 2.77 (SD = 2.19; range 0-8). Acceptability was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who accepted and completed the treatment. Satisfaction was evaluated by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. Secondary objectives were to assess the treatment effectiveness by questionnaires at pre-treatment, seven days post-treatment and three months follow-up.

resultsThe treatment was highly acceptable (91.3% accepted, all completed), and patients were highly satisfied with the treatment, including the amount. Functional impairment, as measured by Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) improved significantly (p < .0005) from "severe" (mean 25.4 SD = 6.59) to "less severe" (mean 13.37, SD = 9.43) at 3 months follow-up. Using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the effect sizes at 3 months follow-up were 1.21 for anxiety and 1.3 for depression. More than 80% reported reduced utilization of mental health care, and 67% had not used, or had used the family doctor less, for anxiety or depression. 52% had not used, or had reduced, medication for their disorder.

conclusionsThe concentrated, interdisciplinary treatment approach yielded promising results. Long-term follow up is warranted.

trial registrationThis study is registered in Clinical Trials, identifier NCT05234281 and approval date 09/02/2022.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionAdultAnxiety DisordersHumansPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsAnxietyConcentratedDepressionGroup treatmentInterdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID36058925
PMCPMC9441319
OpenAlexW4294659990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.