Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36058559›Full record

ArticleAsian spine journal2022

Introduction of a Novel "Segmentation Line" to Analyze the Variations in Segmental Lordosis, Location of the Lumbar Apex, and Their Correlation with Spinopelvic Parameters in Asymptomatic Adults.

Kalyan Kumar Varma Kalidindi, Gururaj Sangondimath, Kuldeep Bansal, Gayatri Vishwakarma, Harvinder Singh Chhabra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantifying apex mismatch: a new method to assess spinal and rod apex position in sagittal realignment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kalyan Kumar Varma KalidindiDepartment of Spine Service, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.
Gururaj SangondimathDepartment of Spine Service, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.
Kuldeep BansalDepartment of Spine Service, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.
Gayatri VishwakarmaDepartment of Biostatistics, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.
Harvinder Singh ChhabraDepartment of Spine Service, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCross-sectional study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to understand the sagittal spinopelvic parameters, segmental lumbar parameters, and lumbar apex location in asymptomatic adults and analyze their correlations with each other. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Roussouly and his colleagues reported that pelvic incidence (PI) influences the lower arc of lumbar lordosis, whereas Pesenti and his colleagues reported that PI influences only the proximal part of lordosis and not the distal part. Both studies have their shortcomings.

methodsOne hundred asymptomatic adult volunteers (mean age, 29.1±7.9 years; 69 males, 31 females) who satisfied the selection criteria were enrolled in this study. Standing antero-posterior and lateral whole spine and pelvis X-rays were performed, and the radiographic parameters were analyzed. We introduced a "segmentation line" bisecting the apical vertebra/disk to divide the upper arc of lumbar lordosis (ULL) and lower arc of lumbar lordosis (LLL).

resultsThe mean PI was 48.02°, ULL 29.12°, LLL 16.02°, total lumbar lordosis (TLL) 45.14°, lumbar tilt angle 4.73°, and location of the apex of lumbar lordosis (LLA) 4.11°. The location of the lumbar apex moved higher as the PI increased. The PI was strongly positively correlated with the LLL (r =0.582, p <0.001) and TLL (r =0.579, p <0.001) but not with the ULL (r =0.196, p =0.05). The LLA was strongly positively correlated with the ULL (r =0.349, p <0.001), negatively with the LLL (r =-0.63, p <0.001), and not correlated with the TLL (r =-0.177, p =0.078).

conclusionsThe PI influences the location of the lumbar apex, the LLL, and the TLL but not the ULL. The location of the lumbar apex significantly influences the segmental lordosis but not the TLL.

Indexed as

Lumbar apexPelvic incidenceSegmental lordosisSegmentation lineSpinopelvic parameters

Identifiers

PMID36058559
PMCPMC9441431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.