Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36058556›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2022

Virtual navigation bronchoscopy-guided intraoperative indocyanine green localization in simultaneous surgery for multiple pulmonary nodules.

Qingjie Yang, Kaibao Han, Shenghua Lv, Qingtian Li, Xiaoyan Sun, Xinhai Feng, Mingqiang Kang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Highlights 57th SEPAR Congress].Open respiratory archives
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Qingjie YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-343X
Kaibao HanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiamen Humanity Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, P. R. China.
Shenghua LvDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiamen Humanity Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, P. R. China.
Qingtian LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiamen Humanity Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, P. R. China.
Xiaoyan SunDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiamen Humanity Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, P. R. China.
Xinhai FengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiamen Humanity Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, P. R. China.
Mingqiang KangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-0715-6556
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate localization of pulmonary nodules is the main difficulty experienced in wedge resection. Commonly used localization methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. However, clinical work has demonstrated that intraoperative indocyanine green localization under electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy/virtual navigation bronchoscopy (VNB) is more advantageous than conventional methods for patients with multiple pulmonary nodules undergoing simultaneous surgery, especially for those undergoing bilateral lung surgery.

methodsData of patients undergoing simultaneous surgery for multiple pulmonary nodules with preoperative methylene blue localization by computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous lung puncture (methylene blue group) or intraoperative indocyanine green localization under VNB (virtual navigation group) were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, pulmonary nodule features, localization time, preoperative location time, location success rate, operation time, complication incidence, visceral pleural staining rate after localization, and pulmonary nodule primary resection success rate were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe methylene blue and virtual navigation groups comprised 39 and 20 patients with 119 and 67 pulmonary nodules resected, respectively. Sex, age, number of pulmonary nodules resected simultaneously, unilateral/bilateral lung surgery, pulmonary nodule size, distance between pulmonary nodules and the visceral pleura, pulmonary nodule consolidation-to-tumor ratio, location of pulmonary nodules in the pulmonary lobe, postoperative pathology, visceral pleura staining rate, primary pulmonary nodule resection success rate, and surgical duration did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0.05). The localization time of the virtual navigation group was significantly shorter than that of the methylene blue group (p < 0.05), regardless of unilateral or bilateral multiple nodules. In the methylene blue group, 25.64% (10/39) of patients presented complications, all of which were pneumothorax, whereas no complications were found in the virtual navigation group.

conclusionsFor patients with multiple pulmonary nodules undergoing simultaneous surgery, indocyanine green injection under VNB can achieve a similar effect on pulmonary nodule localization as classical methylene blue injection under CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture, with shorter localization time and fewer complications.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleBronchoscopyHumansIndocyanine GreenMethylene BlueRetrospective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedIndocyanine GreenMethylene Blueintraoperative localizationmultiple pulmonary nodulessimultaneous surgeryvirtual navigation bronchoscopywedge resection

Identifiers

PMID36058556
PMCPMC9575123
OpenAlexW4294670400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.