GuidelineTransplantation and cellular therapy2022
Nomenclature for Cellular and Genetic Therapies: A Need for Standardization.
Guideline in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene editing of hematopoietic stem cells: applications and advances.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Cell and Gene Therapy Development.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- "Snip, snip, cure"? Philosophical, legal and biomedical perspectives on novel somatic genomic therapies.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- Antibiotic use: impact on the microbiome and cellular therapy outcomes.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Article
- A roadmap for affordable genetic medicines.Nature · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the field of cellular and genetic therapies transitions from a scientific concept to a clinical reality, it has become evident that there are several conflicting or imprecise nomenclatures to describe these novel therapeutic products. The lack of uniformity and accuracy in the terminology often creates regulatory, educational, administrative, and billing quagmires. Standardization of the nomenclature for these therapeutic products is essential for creation of a harmonized regulatory and developmental framework, development of training paradigms and educational programs, equitable and rational decisions about accessibility, and consistency in the billing and coding structures used for reimbursement. Here we propose an updated framework as a foundation for categorizing these cell-based and genetically modified therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.