Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36058330›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

Long-term passive wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 for seven university dormitories in comparison to municipal surveillance.

N Jain, D Hamilton, S Mital, A Ilias, M Brinkmann, K McPhedran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diurnal changes in pathogenic and indicator virus concentrations in wastewater.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N JainDepartment of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
D HamiltonDepartment of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
S MitalDepartment of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
A IliasDepartment of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
M BrinkmannGlobal Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. Electronic address: markus.brinkmann@usask.ca.
K McPhedranDepartment of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) has been an effective tool for monitoring and understanding potential SARS-CoV-2 transmission across small and large-scale communities. In this study at the University of Saskatchewan, the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 was done over eight months during the 2021-2022 academic year. Wastewater samples were collected using passive samplers that were deployed in domestic sewer lines near adjacent campus residences and extracted for viral RNA, followed by Reverse Transcription quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR). The results showed similar trends for SARS-CoV-2 detection frequencies and viral loads across university residences, the whole campus, and from related WBS at Saskatoon Wastewater Treatment Plant. The maximum daily detection frequency for seven dormitories considered was about 75 %, while maximum daily case numbers for the residences and campus-wide were about 11 and 75 people, respectively. In addition, self-reported rates of infection on campus peaked during similar time frames as increases in viral load were detected at the Saskatoon wastewater treatment plant. These similarities indicate the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of monitoring the spread of COVID-19 in small-scale communities using WBS.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansRNA, ViralUniversitiesWastewaterWastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringRNA, ViralWastewaterCOVID-19Passive samplingSARS-CoV-2University residencesWastewater-based surveillance (WBS)

Identifiers

PMID36058330
PMCPMC9433341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.