Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36058141›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2022

Design and engineering of genetically encoded protein biosensors for small molecules.

Alison C Leonard, Timothy A Whitehead

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel strategies to manage CAR-T cell toxicity.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Artificial Olfactory Biohybrid System: An Evolving Sense of Smell.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alison C LeonardDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
Timothy A WhiteheadDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80305, USA. Electronic address: timothy.whitehead@colorado.edu.

Funding

Predoctoral Training Molecular BiophysicsT32GM065103 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI FALKE, JOSEPH J · 2002 to 2021
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically encoded protein biosensors controlled by small organic molecules are valuable tools for many biotechnology applications, including control of cellular decisions in living cells. Here, we review recent advances in protein biosensor design and engineering for binding to novel ligands. We categorize sensor architecture as either integrated or portable, where portable biosensors uncouple molecular recognition from signal transduction. Proposed advances to improve portable biosensor development include standardizing a limited set of protein scaffolds, and automating ligand-compatibility screening and ligand-protein-interface design.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesBiotechnologyLigandsProtein EngineeringProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36058141
PMCPMC12543005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.