Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36058135›Full record

Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2022

Efficacy of a food response and attention training treatment for obesity: A randomized placebo controlled trial.

Eric Stice, Sonja Yokum, Jeff Gau, Harm Veling, Natalia Lawrence, Eva Kemps

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Eric SticeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: estice@stanford.edu.
Sonja YokumOregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Drive, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Jeff GauOregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Drive, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Harm VelingBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9104, 6500, HE, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Natalia LawrenceSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Eva KempsSchool of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Oregon Research Institute · USFlinders University · AURadboud University Nijmegen · NLStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Translational Neuroscience: Response Training for Obesity Treatment.R01DK112762 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK112762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated brain reward and attention region response, and weaker inhibitory region response to high-calorie foods has predicted future weight gain, suggesting that an intervention that reduces reward and attention region response and increases inhibitory region response to such foods might reduce overeating. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test whether a multi-faceted food response and attention training protocol with personalized high- and low-calorie food images would reduce body fat and valuation and reward region response to high-calorie foods compared to a placebo control training protocol with non-food images in an effort to replicate findings from two past trials. Participants were community-recruited adults with overweight/obesity (N = 179; M age = 27.7 ± 7.0) who completed assessments at pretest, posttest, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups. Participants randomized to the food response inhibition and attention training showed significantly greater increases in palatability ratings of low-calorie foods than controls (d = 0.27) at posttest, but did not show body fat loss, reductions in palatability ratings and monetary valuation, or reward region response, to high-calorie foods. The lack of expected effects appears to be related to weaker learning compared to the learning in past trials, potentially because we used more heterogenous high-calorie and low-calorie food images in the present training.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingObesityAdultAttentionFoodHumansRewardYoung AdultAttentionAttention trainingFat lossObesity treatmentResponse trainingReward

Identifiers

PMID36058135
PMCPMC10392892
OpenAlexW4293456783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.