ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
A comprehensive quality assurance procedure for 4D CT commissioning and periodic QA.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- SiViS: Simulated multi-patient physiological clinical states for advanced vital sign radar monitoring research.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Phantom-based assessment of a modified 4D-MRI protocol for abdominal tumor motion tracking: Effects of sequence parameters and modality comparison.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- A streamlined workflow for comprehensive 4DCT imaging QA with automated analysis of spatial integrity and image quality.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Shallow kinetics induced by a metronome (SKIM): A novel contactless respiratory motion management.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Results of a multicenter 4D computed tomography quality assurance audit: Evaluating image accuracy and consistency.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- A comprehensive quality assurance program for four-dimensional computed tomography in radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- 4DCT is long overdue for improvement.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- A comprehensive quality assurance procedure for 4D CT commissioning and periodic QA.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe 4D computed tomography (CT) simulation is an essential procedure for tumors exhibiting breathing-induced motion. However, to date there are no established guidelines to assess the characteristics of existing systems and to describe meaningful performance. We propose a commissioning quality assurance (QA) protocol consisting of measurements and acquisitions that assess the mechanical and computational operation for 4D CT with both phase and amplitude-based reconstructions, for regular and irregular respiratory patterns.
methodsThe 4D CT scans of a QUASAR motion phantom were acquired for both regular and irregular breathing patterns. The hardware consisted of the Canon Aquilion Exceed LB CT scanner used in conjunction with the Anzai laser motion monitoring system. The nominal machine performance and reconstruction were demonstrated with measurements using regular breathing patterns. For irregular breathing patterns the performance was quantified through the analysis of the target motion in the superior and inferior directions, and the volume of the internal target volume (ITV). Acquisitions were performed using multiple pitches and the reconstructions were performed using both phase and amplitude-based binning.
resultsThe target was accurately captured during regular breathing. For the irregular breathing, the measured ITV exceeded the nominal ITV parameters in all scenarios, but all deviations were less than the reconstructed slice thickness. The mismatch between the nominal pitch and the actual breathing rate did not affect markedly the size of the ITV. Phase and normalized amplitude binning performed similarly.
conclusionsWe demonstrated a framework for measuring and quantifying the initial performance of 4D CT simulation scans that can also be applied during periodic QAs. The regular breathing provided confidence that the hardware and the software between the systems performs adequately. The irregular breathing data suggest that the system may be expected to capture in excess the target motion and geometry, but the deviation is expected to be within the slice thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.