ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2022
Effects and Prognosis of Cataract Surgery in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraocular Lens Positional Instability and Refractive Prediction Error after Cataract Surgery in Eyes with Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Comparative Study.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2026Article
- Article
- Potential guidelines for cataract surgery and rehabilitation in visually impaired patients: Literature analysis.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2024Review
- Cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Review
- Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Clinical Management and Emerging Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinical presentation and macular morphology in retinitis pigmentosa patients.Annals of African medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCataract extraction could improve visual acuity (VA) for patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), while the surgery may increase photoreceptor degeneration through light damage. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness and prediction of VA after cataract surgery in patients with RP.
methodsWe comprehensively extracted data from literature of available studies with quality control processing. Improvement of VA before and after cataract surgery of different durations of follow-up and different structural integrity of the preoperative macular ellipsoid zone (EZ) in patients with RP were compared. VA was measured by the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).
resultsSixteen studies were subjected to analysis. Postoperative VA was significantly improved versus preoperative, with a mean difference (MD) of 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45, 0.69], and a fixed-effect model was applied during follow-up durations of 1 day to 1 month (I
conclusionsCataract surgery could improve VA for patients with RP during long-term follow-up, and the surgery is not recommended for patients with invisible preoperative macular EZ. However, further studies are required to address the problem of excessive light exposure to the degenerated retina in patients with RP with the cataract removed. The study protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022340165).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.