Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057820›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Identification of Early Onset Dementia in Population-Based Health Administrative Data: A Validation Study Using Primary Care Electronic Medical Records.

Liisa Jaakkimainen, Raquel Duchen, Lisa Lix, Saeed Al-Azazi, Bing Yu, Debra Butt, Su-Bin Park, Jessica Widdifield

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Misclassification bias in chronic disease case ascertainment algorithms: a reclassification approach.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liisa JaakkimainenInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Raquel DuchenInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lisa LixInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Saeed Al-AzaziCommunity Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Bing YuInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Debra ButtDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Su-Bin ParkPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jessica WiddifieldInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly onset dementia (EOD) occurs when symptoms of dementia begin between 45 to 64 years of age.

objectiveWe developed and validated health administrative data algorithms for EOD and compared demographic characteristics and presence of comorbid conditions amongst adults with EOD, late onset dementia (LOD) and adults with no dementia in Ontario, Canada.

methodsPatients aged 45 to 64 years identified as having EOD in their primary care electronic medical records had their records linked to provincial health administrative data. We compared several combinations of physician's claims, hospitalizations, emergency department visits and prescriptions. Age-standardized incidence and prevalence rates of EOD were estimated from 1996 to 2016.

resultsThe prevalence of EOD for adults aged 45 to 64 years in our primary care reference cohort was 0.12%. An algorithm of ≥1 hospitalization or ≥3 physician claims at least 30 days apart in a two-year period or ≥1 dementia medication had a sensitivity of 72.9% (64.5-81.3), specificity of 99.7% (99.7-99.8), positive predictive value (PPV) of 23.7% (19.1-28.3), and negative predictive value of 100.0%. Multivariate logistic regression found adults with EOD had increased odds ratios for several health conditions compared to LOD and no dementia populations. From 1996 to 2016, the age-adjusted incidence rate increased slightly (0.055 to 0.061 per 100 population) and the age-adjusted prevalence rate increased three-fold (0.11 to 0.32 per 100 population).

conclusionWhile we developed a health administrative data algorithm for EOD with a reasonable sensitivity, its low PPV limits its ability to be used for population surveillance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDementiaElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPrevalencePrimary Health CareAdministrative dataalgorithmearly onset dementiaprimary care electronic medical records

Identifiers

PMID36057820
PMCPMC9661344
OpenAlexW4294266627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.