ArticleBiophysical journal2022
Predicting accurate ab initio DNA electron densities with equivariant neural networks.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image super-resolution inspired electron density prediction.Nature communications · 2025Article
- In Vivo Interactions of Nucleic Acid Nanostructures With Cells.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- DNA damage and repair in the nucleosome: insights from computational methods.Biophysical reviews · 2024Review
- Exploring protein-ligand binding affinity prediction with electron density-based geometric deep learning.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the fundamental limitations of accurately modeling biomolecules like DNA is the inability to perform quantum chemistry calculations on large molecular structures. We present a machine learning model based on an equivariant Euclidean neural network framework to obtain accurate ab initio electron densities for arbitrary DNA structures that are much too large for conventional quantum methods. The model is trained on representative B-DNA basepair steps that capture both base pairing and base stacking interactions. The model produces accurate electron densities for arbitrary B-DNA structures with typical errors of less than 1%. Crucially, the error does not increase with system size, which suggests that the model can extrapolate to large DNA structures with negligible loss of accuracy. The model also generalizes reasonably to other DNA structural motifs such as the A- and Z-DNA forms, despite being trained on only B-DNA configurations. The model is used to calculate electron densities of several large-scale DNA structures, and we show that the computational scaling for this model is essentially linear. We also show that this machine learning electron density model can be used to calculate accurate electrostatic potentials for DNA. These electrostatic potentials produce more accurate results compared with classical force fields and do not show the usual deficiencies at short range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.