Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057739›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

Direct identification of ALK and ROS1 fusions in non-small cell lung cancer from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides using deep learning algorithms.

Chen Mayer, Efrat Ofek, Danielle Even Fridrich, Yossef Molchanov, Rinat Yacobi, Inbal Gazy, Ido Hayun, Jonathan Zalach, Nurit Paz-Yaacov, Iris Barshack

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. RAF and MEK Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chen Mayer *Institute of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. chen.mayer@sheba.health.gov.il.ORCID 0000-0002-7871-6338
Efrat Ofek *Institute of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Danielle Even FridrichInstitute of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Yossef MolchanovInstitute of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Rinat YacobiInstitute of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Inbal GazyImagene AI, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ido HayunImagene AI, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jonathan ZalachImagene AI, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nurit Paz-YaacovImagene AI, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Iris BarshackInstitute of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sheba Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusions are well-established key players in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although their frequency is relatively low, their detection is important for patient care and guides therapeutic decisions. The accepted methods used for their detection are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, as well as DNA and RNA-based sequencing methodologies. These assays are expensive, time-consuming, and require technical expertise and specialized equipment as well as biological specimens that are not always available. Here we present an alternative detection method using a computer vision deep learning approach. An advanced convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to generate classifier models to detect ALK and ROS1-fusions directly from scanned hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole slide images prepared from NSCLC tumors of patients. A two-step training approach was applied, with an initial unsupervised training step performed on a pan-cancer sample cohort followed by a semi-supervised fine-tuning step, which supported the development of a classifier with performances equal to those accepted for diagnostic tests. Validation of the ALK/ROS1 classifier on a cohort of 72 lung cancer cases who underwent ALK and ROS1-fusion testing at the pathology department at Sheba Medical Center displayed sensitivities of 100% for both genes (six ALK-positive and two ROS1-positive cases) and specificities of 100% and 98.6% respectively for ALK and ROS1, with only one false-positive result for ROS1-alteration. These results demonstrate the potential advantages that machine learning solutions may have in the molecular pathology domain, by allowing fast, standardized, accurate, and robust biomarker detection overcoming many limitations encountered when using current techniques. The integration of such novel solutions into the routine pathology workflow can support and improve the current clinical pipeline.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseEosine Yellowish-(YS)Gene RearrangementHematoxylinHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOncogene Proteins, FusionProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseEosine Yellowish-(YS)HematoxylinOncogene Proteins, FusionProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsROS1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID36057739
PMCPMC9708557
OpenAlexW4294397972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.