Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057730›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2022

Clinical significance of gastroesophageal reflux disease with minimal change: a multicenter prospective observational study.

Noriaki Manabe, Takashi Joh, Kazuhide Higuchi, Katsuhiko Iwakiri, Takeshi Kamiya, Ken Haruma, Koji Nakada

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06778395 (Therapeutic Effect of Vonoprazan Versus Dexlansoprazole in Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Egyptian Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06778395 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Effect of Vonoprazan Versus Dexlansoprazole in Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Egyptian Patients: A Prospective Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAyman Magd Eldin Mohammad SadekRan2024 to 2024Enrolled136ConditionsVonoprazan, Proton Pump Inhibitor, Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseArmsDexlansoprazole 60 mg, Vonoprazan 20 mg bid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noriaki ManabeDivision of Endoscopy and Ultrasonography, Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, 2-6-1 Nakasange, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8505, Japan. n_manabe@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp.
Takashi Joh *Gamagori City Hospital, 1-1 Mukaida, Hirata-cho, Gamagori City, Aichi, 443-8501, Japan.
Kazuhide Higuchi *Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Katsuhiko Iwakiri *Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 133-8603, Japan.
Takeshi Kamiya *Department of Medical Innovation, Nagoya City University Graduate School Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.
Ken Haruma *Department of General Internal Medicine 2, Kawasaki Medical School, 2-6-1 Nakasange, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8505, Japan.
Koji Nakada *Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1, Izumihon-cho, Komae City, Tokyo, 201-8601, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is classified into grade N (no minimal change) and grade M (minimal change) based on the Los Angeles classification. However, few reports have described the clinical characteristics of grade M. This study was performed to clarify the clinical characteristics of grade M. Among 290 consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), 45 patients with grade M, 62 patients with grade N, and 94 patients with grade A were compared with respect to clinical differences. The degree of symptom improvement after 4 weeks of proton pump inhibitor administration was also prospectively compared among the three groups. Grades N and M showed no or little difference in the patients' backgrounds (including sex and body mass index), GERD/functional dyspepsia symptom scores, life dissatisfaction (diet, sleep, work, and mood), Short Form-8 (mental component summary) scores, and symptom improvement. In contrast, significant differences were present between grades M and A as well as between grades N and A. The overall results of our study suggest that the distinction between grade M and grade N is of little clinical significance from the viewpoint of clinical characteristics.

Indexed as

DyspepsiaGastroesophageal RefluxHumansProton Pump InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36057730
PMCPMC9440892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.