Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057698›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2022

Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project.

Louise Rainford, Joana Santos, Francisco Alves, João Paulo Figueiredo, Christoph Hoeschen, John Damilakis, Guy Frija, Jonas Andersson, Jonathan McNulty, Shane Foley and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Louise RainfordRadiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Room A201, UCD Health Science Centre, Belfield Campus, Dublin 4, Ireland. louise.rainford@ucd.ie.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-0782
Joana SantosInstituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC - Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Coimbra, Portugal.
Francisco AlvesInstituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC - Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Coimbra, Portugal.
João Paulo FigueiredoInstituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC - Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Coimbra, Portugal.
Christoph HoeschenInstitute of Medical Technology, Otto-Von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
John DamilakisSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.
Guy FrijaUniversité de Paris, Paris, France.
Jonas AnderssonDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics, Umeå, Sweden.
Jonathan McNultyRadiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Room A201, UCD Health Science Centre, Belfield Campus, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Shane FoleyRadiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Room A201, UCD Health Science Centre, Belfield Campus, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Klaus BacherDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ursula NestleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
Monika HierathEuropean Institute for Biomedical Imaging Research (EIBIR), Vienna, Austria.
Graciano PauloInstituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC - Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

European Commission 899995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the "Strengths", "Weaknesses", "Opportunities" and "Threats" related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU.

resultsConsensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers.

conclusionsA lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains.

Indexed as

EducationRadiation protectionSWOT AnalysisTrainer development

Identifiers

PMID36057698
PMCPMC9440860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.