ArticleTrends in pharmacological sciences2023
Structural snapshot of a β-arrestin-biased receptor.
Article in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular insights into intrinsic transducer-coupling bias in the CXCR4-CXCR7 system.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atypical chemokine receptor subtype 3 (ACKR3), a chemokine receptor, couples selectively to β-arrestins (βarrs) but not to G proteins despite having seven transmembrane (7TM) helix architecture. Yen et al. present cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of agonist-bound ACKR3, elucidating a distinct chemokine-binding mechanism, and offering a structural template to probe the transducer-coupling bias at this receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.