Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057387›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of pain2022

The Relationship Between Pain-Related Psychological Factors and Maximal Physical Performance in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Thomas Matheve, Lotte Janssens, Nina Goossens, Lieven Danneels, Tine Willems, Jessica Van Oosterwijck, Liesbet De Baets

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas MatheveSpine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium. Electronic address: Thomas.Matheve@ugent.be.
Lotte JanssensREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Nina GoossensREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Lieven DanneelsSpine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Tine WillemsSpine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jessica Van OosterwijckSpine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group.
Liesbet De BaetsPain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEHasselt University · BEPain in Motion · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical frameworks explain how pain-related psychological factors may influence the physical performance. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the evidence regarding the relationship between the pain-related psychological factors and the maximal physical performance in patients with low back pain (LBP). Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to May 2022. Cross-sectional or longitudinal studies reporting cross-sectional measures of association between at least one pain-related psychological factor and a quantitatively measured outcome of maximal physical performance in patients with LBP were eligible for inclusion. Thirty-eight studies (n = 2,490; 27 cross-sectional studies, n = 1,647 (66%); 11 longitudinal studies, n = 843 (34%)) were included, with 92% of participants (n = 2,284) having chronic LBP. Results showed that pain-related fear, pain catastrophizing, and anticipated pain were consistently and negatively associated with the maximal physical performance in chronic LBP, whereas pain-self efficacy showed positive correlations. Overall, magnitudes of absolute pooled r-values were small (r ≤ 0.25), except for anticipated pain, which was moderately associated with maximal physical performance (r = -0.34 to -0.37). Subanalyses and sensitivity analyses yielded similar pooled correlation coefficients. Certainty of evidence using the GRADE recommendations was very low to moderate for pain-related fear, and very low to low for the other pain-related psychological factors. Prospero registration: CRD42021227486. PERSPECTIVE: Overall, small pooled correlation coefficients were shown between pain-related psychological factors and maximal physical performance in chronic LBP. Certainty of evidence was very low to low for all pain-related psychological factors other than pain-related fear. Future studies taking into account limitations of the current literature may therefore change these conclusions.

Indexed as

Low Back PainCatastrophizationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPhysical Functional PerformanceSelf EfficacybehaviourLow back painphysical performancepsychological factorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36057387
OpenAlexW4293764063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.