Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057206›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2022

Clinical characteristics and comparison of longitudinal qPCR results from different specimen types in a cohort of ambulatory and hospitalized patients infected with monkeypox virus.

Dominik Nörz, Thomas Theo Brehm, Hui Ting Tang, Ilka Grewe, Lennart Hermanussen, Hanna Matthews, Julia Pestel, Olaf Degen, Thomas Günther, Adam Grundhoff and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Comparative study of different methods of detection of Monkeypox: antigen versus PCR].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dominik NörzUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: d.noerz@uke.de.
Thomas Theo BrehmUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), I. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, Partner site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Germany.
Hui Ting TangUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Hamburg, Germany.
Ilka GreweUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), I. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.
Lennart HermanussenUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), I. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.
Hanna MatthewsAmbulance Center of the UKE GmbH, Department of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.
Julia PestelAmbulance Center of the UKE GmbH, Department of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.
Olaf DegenAmbulance Center of the UKE GmbH, Department of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas GüntherLeibniz Institute for Virology (LIV), Hamburg, Germany.
Adam GrundhoffLeibniz Institute for Virology (LIV), Hamburg, Germany.
Nicole FischerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Hamburg, Germany.
Marylyn M AddoUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), I. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute for Infection research and Vaccine development (IIRVD), Hamburg, Germany; Bernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (BNI), Department of Clinical Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, Partner site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Germany.
Sabine JordanUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), I. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.
Sandra HertlingPraxisgemeinschaft Dr. Dirk Berzow, Andreas Christl und Dr. Sandra Hertling, Hamburg, Germany.
Stephan UngerInstitute for interdisciplinary medicine (ifi), Hamburg, Germany.
Guido SchäferICH Hamburg-Stendal, Hamburg, Germany.
Knud ScheweICH Hamburg-Stendal, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian HoffmannICH Hamburg-Stendal, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin AepfelbacherUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Hamburg, Germany.
Susanne PfefferleUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Hamburg, Germany; Bernhard-Nocht institute for tropical medicine (BNITM), Molecular Biology and Immunology, Virology Department, Hamburg, Germany.
Julian Schulze Zur WieschUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), I. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, Partner site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Germany.
Stefan SchmiedelUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), I. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.
Marc LütgehetmannUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: mluetgeh@uke.de.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEInfektionsmedizinisches Centrum Hamburg · DELeibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) · DEInstitute for Interdisciplinary Medicine · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ongoing monkeypox virus outbreak includes at least 7553 confirmed cases in previously non-endemic countries worldwide as of July 2022. Clinical presentation has been reported as highly variable, sometimes lacking classically described systemic symptoms, and only small numbers of cutaneous lesions in most patients. The aim of this study was to compare clinical data with longitudinal qPCR results from lesion swabs, oropharyngeal swabs and blood in a well characterized patient cohort.

methods16 male patients (5 hospitalized, 11 outpatients) were included in the study cohort and serial testing for monkeypox virus-DNA carried out in various materials throughout the course of disease. Laboratory analysis included quantitative PCR, next-generation sequencing, immunofluorescence tests and virus isolation in cell culture.

resultsAll patients were male, between age 20 and 60, and self-identified as men having sex with men. Two had a known HIV infection, coinciding with an increased number of lesions and viral DNA detectable in blood. In initial- and serial testing, lesion swabs yielded viral DNA-loads at, or above 10 DISCUSSION: The data presented underscore the reliability of lesion swabs for monkeypox virus-detection, even in later stages of the disease. Oropharyngeal swabs and blood samples alone carry the risk of false negative results, but may hold value in pre-/asymptomatic cases or viral load monitoring, respectively.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMpox, MonkeypoxAdultDNA, ViralFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonkeypox virusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultDNA, ViralClinical cohortClinical specimensMonkeypox virusqPCRViral load kinetics

Identifiers

PMID36057206
PMCPMC9528238
OpenAlexW4294344132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.