Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057141›Full record

ArticleRespiratory medicine2022

Clinical prediction models in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study.

Maria Cristina Vedovati, Greta Barbieri, Chiara Urbini, Erika D'Agostini, Simone Vanni, Chiara Papalini, Giacomo Pucci, Ludovica Anna Cimini, Alessandro Valentino, Lorenzo Ghiadoni and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Cristina VedovatiInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine - Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: mariacristina.vedovati@unipg.it.
Greta BarbieriDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Italy; Emergency Medicine Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Italy.
Chiara UrbiniInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine - Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Erika D'AgostiniInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine - Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; Emergency Department, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Simone VanniEmergency Department, Empoli Hospital, Empoli, Italy.
Chiara PapaliniInfectious Diseases Clinic, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giacomo PucciDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Unit of Internal Medicine, "Santa Maria" Terni University Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Ludovica Anna CiminiInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine - Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alessandro ValentinoEmergency Department, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Lorenzo GhiadoniEmergency Medicine Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Cecilia BecattiniInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine - Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale 11 di Empoli · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical spectrum of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) ranges from asymptomatic infection to severe respiratory failure that may result in death. We aimed at validating and potentially improve existing clinical models to predict prognosis in hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19.

methodsConsecutive patients with acute confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia hospitalized at 5 Italian non-intensive care unit centers during the 2020 outbreak were included in the study. Twelve validated prognostic scores for pneumonia and/or sepsis and specific COVID-19 scores were calculated for each study patient and their accuracy was compared in predicting in-hospital death at 30 days and the composite of death and orotracheal intubation.

resultsDuring hospital stay, 302 of 1044 included patients presented critical illness (28.9%), and 226 died (21.6%). Nine out of 34 items included in different prognostic scores were independent predictors of all-cause-death. The discrimination was acceptable for the majority of scores (APACHE II, COVID-GRAM, REMS, CURB-65, NEWS II, ROX-index, 4C, SOFA) to predict in-hospital death at 30 days and poor for the rest. A high negative predictive value was observed for REMS (100.0%) and 4C (98.7%) scores; the positive predictive value was poor overall, ROX-index having the best value (75.0%).

conclusionsDespite the growing interest in prognostic models, their performance in patients with COVID-19 is modest. The 4C, REMS and ROX-index may have a role to select high and low risk patients at admission. However, simple predictors as age and PaO2/FiO2 ratio can also be useful as standalone predictors to inform decision making.

Indexed as

COVID-19PneumoniaCohort StudiesHospital MortalityHumansModels, StatisticalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesClinical decision rulesMortalitySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36057141
PMCPMC9392655
OpenAlexW4292824365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.