Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057021›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2022

A Systematic Review of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Bariatric Research Trials: The Need for More Work.

Aya Musbahi, Danielle Clyde, Peter Small, Michael Courtney, Kamal Mahawar, Peter J Lamb, Andrew G N Robertson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aya MusbahiBariatric Surgery Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK. aya.musbahi1@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0001-7020-9457
Danielle ClydeUpper GI Unit, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Peter SmallBariatric Surgery Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Michael CourtneyBariatric Surgery Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Kamal MahawarBariatric Surgery Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Peter J LambUpper GI Unit, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Andrew G N RobertsonGeneral Surgery Department, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, KY2 5AH, UK.
Sunderland Royal Hospital · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBVictoria Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient and public involvement (PPI) has gained increased attention in research circles. The consistency of PPI reporting has been addressed by the development of validated checklists such as GRIPP and GRIPP2. The primary aim of this study was to identify the incidence of PPI reporting in bariatric research. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL/Cochrane databases were searched for publications between 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2021 for "bariatric surgery" OR "weight loss surgery" OR "obesity surgery" AND "randomized controlled trials." Ninety studies fulfilled exclusion criteria; two studies reported direct PPI involvement, one indirectly used PPI and one reported not using PPI methods. No other study made direct or indirect mention of PPI. Concluding, that GRIPP2 and PPI reporting in bariatric surgery trials is lacking.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidChecklistHumansPatient ParticipationBariatric surgeryPatient and public involvementResearch trialTrial methodology

Identifiers

PMID36057021
OpenAlexW4294414984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.