Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057009›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023

Educational quality and content of YouTube videos on diabetic macular edema.

Jasmine Mahajan, Aretha Zhu, Owais M Aftab, Roger K Henry, Nathan Y B Agi, Neelakshi Bhagat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. HbA1c AND E-HEALTH: YOUTUBE MIGHT BE GOOD FOR YOU, IF YOU USE IT WISELY.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasmine MahajanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2743-5955
Aretha ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5323-7157
Owais M AftabDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-3956
Roger K HenryDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-6409
Nathan Y B AgiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7821-6675
Neelakshi BhagatDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA. bhagatne@njms.rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-3145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiabetic macular edema (DME) is a vision-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus due to increased vascular permeability. Patients are increasingly using YouTube videos to educate themselves about DME. This study analyzes the content and quality of YouTube videos about DME.

methodsVideos were searched in December 2021 for "diabetic macular edema." The first 100 videos sorted by both relevance and view count were reviewed (n = 200). Quantitative metrics and content were collected. Two reviewers assessed videos using the JAMA (0-4), modified DISCERN (1-5), and Global Quality Scale (GQS, 1-5). Videos were sorted into author groups: 1 (academic institutions/organizations), 2 (private practices/organizations), and 3 (independent users; ophthalmologist users noted). Statistical analyses were deemed significant at a = 0.05.

resultsOne hundred four videos were included after applying exclusion criteria. Overall mean + standard deviations were 2.25 ± 0.83 (JAMA), 3.47 ± 0.55 (DISCERN), and 3.95 ± 0.95 (GQS). 51.9% of videos stated a definition, 32.7% mentioned screening, and 50% mentioned any DME risk factor. Healthcare professional-targeted videos had higher JAMA and DISCERN scores than patient-targeted videos (p < 0.05). Videos using ophthalmologists had higher JAMA and DISCERN scores than those lacking their presence (p < 0.05). JAMA scores significantly varied between author groups; within group 3, ophthalmologist-authored videos had higher DISCERN scores (p < 0.05).

conclusionVideos without ophthalmologists or targeted toward patients had poor quality and content coverage. The rising prevalence of diabetes, coupled with increased internet use for acquiring medical information, creates a strong need for high-quality information about DME.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaSocial MediaEducational StatusHumansReproducibility of ResultsSchoolsDiabetesDiabetic macular edemaPatient educationRetinaSocial mediaYouTube

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.