Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056648›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2022

Development and usability testing of a chatbot to promote mental health services use among individuals with eating disorders following screening.

Jillian Shah, Bianca DePietro, Laura D'Adamo, Marie-Laure Firebaugh, Olivia Laing, Lauren A Fowler, Lauren Smolar, Shiri Sadeh-Sharvit, C Barr Taylor, Denise E Wilfley and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jillian ShahDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6006-3263
Bianca DePietroDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1794-2833
Laura D'AdamoDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9963-7316
Marie-Laure FirebaughDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3663-131X
Olivia LaingDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0242-2349
Lauren A FowlerDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9240-7267
Lauren SmolarNational Eating Disorders Association, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-5882
Shiri Sadeh-SharvitCenter for m2Health, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6499-9034
C Barr TaylorCenter for m2Health, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4564-6548
Denise E WilfleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-8689
Ellen E Fitzsimmons-CraftDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7064-3835
Washington University in St. Louis · USPalo Alto University · USNational Eating Disorders Association · US

Funding

Washington University Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK056341 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Brian N Finck · 1999 to 2026
$30.2M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
WUSTL Transdisciplinary Pre- and Postdoctoral Training Program in Obesity and Cardiovascular DiseaseT32HL130357 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2016 to 2025
$4.3M
Harnessing Mobile Technology to Reduce Mental Health Disorders in College PopulationsR01MH115128 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBERG, DANIEL, NEWMAN, MICHELLE G · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Developing an Optimized Conversational Agent or "Chatbot" to Facilitate Mental Health Services Use in Individuals with Eating DisordersK08MH120341 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FITZSIMMONS-CRAFT, ELLEN E. · 2019 to 2023
$824k
A mixed methods approach to understanding obesity risk among sexual minority womenK01MD017630 · NIMHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Lauren Alina Fowler · 2022 to 2026
$596k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL130357NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056341NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD017630NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH120341NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115128NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115128-04S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA significant gap exists between those who need and those who receive care for eating disorders (EDs). Novel solutions are needed to encourage service use and address treatment barriers. This study developed and evaluated the usability of a chatbot designed for pairing with online ED screening. The tool aimed to promote mental health service utilization by improving motivation for treatment and self-efficacy among individuals with EDs.

methodsA chatbot prototype, Alex, was designed using decision trees and theoretically-informed components: psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, personalized recommendations, and repeated administration. Usability testing was conducted over four iterative cycles, with user feedback informing refinements to the next iteration. Post-testing, participants (N= 21) completed the System Usability Scale (SUS), the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE), and a semi-structured interview.

resultsInterview feedback detailed chatbot aspects participants enjoyed and aspects necessitating improvement. Feedback converged on four themes: user experience, chatbot qualities, chatbot content, and ease of use. Following refinements, users described Alex as humanlike, supportive, and encouraging. Content was perceived as novel and personally relevant. USE scores across domains were generally above average (~5 out of 7), and SUS scores indicated "good" to "excellent" usability across cycles, with the final iteration receiving the highest average score. DISCUSSION: Overall, participants generally reflected positively on interactions with Alex, including the initial version. Refinements between cycles further improved user experiences. This study provides preliminary evidence of the feasibility and acceptance of a chatbot designed to promote motivation for and use of services among individuals with EDs. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Low rates of service utilization and treatment have been observed among individuals following online eating disorder screening. Tools are needed, including scalable, digital options, that can be easily paired with screening, to improve motivation for addressing eating disorders and promote service utilization.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersMental Health ServicesHumansMass ScreeningUser-Centered DesignUser-Computer Interfacechatbotchatbot designchatbot developmentconversational agentdigital interventioneating disorderhealth screeningmental health treatmentmhealth

Identifiers

PMID36056648
PMCPMC10053367
OpenAlexW4292230838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.