Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056622›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2023

The effects of an online decision aid to support the reproductive decision-making process of genetically at risk couples-A pilot study.

Yil Severijns, Maartje W F Heijmans, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Emilia K Bijlsma, Nicole Corsten-Janssen, Sara J R Joosten, Sander M J van Kuijk, Klaske D Lichtenbelt, Cecile P E Ottenheim, Kyra E Stuurman and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Yil SeverijnsDepartment of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8138-4741
Maartje W F HeijmansDepartment of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Christine E M de Die-SmuldersGROW School for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Emilia K BijlsmaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nicole Corsten-JanssenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Department of Genetics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sara J R JoostenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sander M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Klaske D LichtenbeltDepartment of Genetics, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cecile P E OttenheimDepartment of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kyra E StuurmanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gita M B Tan-SindhunataDepartment of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hein de VriesDepartment of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth A D M van OschDepartment of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMaastricht University · NLErasmus MC · NLLeiden University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Couples at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring may experience doubts about their reproductive options. This study examines the effects of an online decision aid (DA) on the (joint) reproductive decision-making process of couples (not pregnant at time of inclusion) at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring. The primary outcome is decisional conflict, and secondary outcomes are knowledge, realistic expectations, deliberation, joint informed decision-making, and decisional self-efficacy. These outcomes were measured with a pretest-posttest design: before use (T0), after use (T1), and 2 weeks after use (T2) of the decision aid (DA). Usability of the DA was assessed at T1. Paired sample t-tests were used to compute differences between baseline and subsequent measurements. The comparisons of T0-T1 and T0-T2 indicate a significant reduction in mean decisional conflict scores with stronger effects for participants with high baseline decisional conflict scores. Furthermore, use of the DA led to increased knowledge, improved realistic expectations, and increased levels of deliberation, with higher increase in participants with low baseline scores. Decision self-efficacy only improved for participants with lower baseline scores. Participants indicated that the information in the DA was comprehensible and clearly organized. These first results indicate that this online DA is an appropriate tool to support couples at risk of transmitting a genetic disease and a desire to have (a) child(ren) in their reproductive decision-making process.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Support TechniquesChildEmotionsFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancyReproductiondecision aiddecisional conflictgenetic counseling(joint informed) decision-makingpreimplantation genetic testing (PGT)reproductive genetics

Identifiers

PMID36056622
PMCPMC10087273
OpenAlexW4294363410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.