ArticleCancer science2022
CT and CEA-based machine learning model for predicting malignant pulmonary nodules.
Article in Cancer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance validation and clinical concordance of a novel fully automated immunoassay system for five tumor markers: A comparative study with an international reference platform.Practical laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive Factors and Nomogram for Malignant Pulmonary Nodules (≤ 1 cm).Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- LungPanelNet: a machine learning-based approach for the early prediction and differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical value of peripheral blood miR-21 and miR-486 combined with CT forearly cancer diagnosis in pulmonary nodulessmoking.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- A prediction model based on computed tomography characteristics for identifying malignant from benign sub-centimeter solid pulmonary nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Complex Presentation of Lung Cancer with Obstructive Jaundice.Reports (MDPI) · 2024Article
- Construction of a risk screening and visualization system for pulmonary nodule in physical examination population based on feature self-recognition machine learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Genetic susceptibility loci of lung cancer are associated with malignant risk of pulmonary nodules and improve malignancy diagnosis based on CEA levels.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- Article
- CT and CEA-based machine learning model for predicting malignant pulmonary nodules.Cancer science · 2022Article
- A nomogram diagnostic prediction model of pancreatic metastases of small cell lung carcinoma based on clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT), an efficient radiological technology, is used to detect lung cancer in the clinic. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a common tumor biomarker, is applied in the detection of various tumors. To highlight the advantages of two-dimensional techniques and assist clinicians in optimizing lung cancer diagnostic schemes, we established a favorable model combining CT and CEA. In the study, univariate analysis was performed to screen independent predictors in a training cohort of 271 patients with malignant pulmonary nodules (MPNs) and 92 with benign pulmonary nodules (BPNs). Six machine learning-based models involving five CT predictors (mediastinal lymph node enlargement, lobulation, vascular notch sign, spiculation, and nodule number) and lnCEA were constructed and validated in an independent cohort of 129 participants (92 MPNs and 37 BPNs) by SPSS Modeler. A nomogram and the Delong test were generated by R software. Finally, the model established by logistic regression had highest diagnostic efficiency (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.912). Moreover, the diagnostic ability of the logistic model in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.882, 80.4% sensitivity, 75.7% specificity) was higher than that of the Peking University model (AUC = 0.712, 68.5% sensitivity, 70.3% specificity) and the Mayo model (AUC = 0.745, 62.0% sensitivity, 75.7% specificity). Interestingly, for the participants with intermediate (10-30 mm) and CEA-negative nodule, the model reached an AUC of 0.835 (72.3% sensitivity, 83.3% specificity). The AUC for the early lung cancer was as high as 0.822 with 67.3% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity. As a conclusion, this promising model presents a new diagnostic strategy for the clinic to distinguish MPNs from BPNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.