Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056588›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2022

Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yi Cao, Ye-da Wan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07470359 (Comparison of Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction With Peroneus Longus Autograft With and Without Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07470359 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction With Peroneus Longus Autograft With and Without Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLahore General HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsACL Reconstruction, Intraarticular Injection, PRPArmsPRP injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yi CaoRadiology Department, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin City, China.
Ye-da WanRadiology Department, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin City, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-4228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for patients operated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Databases of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were independently retrieved by two authors, for identifying the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical and imaging outcomes of ACL reconstructed patients augmented with or without PRP. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was utilized to assess the risk of bias of the included trials. We qualitatively synthesized the outcomes include the image evaluations on the healing of bone tunnels, graft remodeling, donor site healing and tunnel widening, and clinical evaluations on knee stability and function, pain symptom by visual analogue scale (VAS), inflammatory parameters and so on. A total of 16 RCTs, including 1025 patients, were included for eligibility. Generally, the included studies were of low risk of bias, but the conducting of allocation concealment was not clearly described in many studies. Three imaging techniques, including MRI, CT and ultrasound, were selected in these trials. Significant improvement on graft remodeling, bone tunnel healing, harvest site healing and bone tunnel diameters were demonstrated in one of five (20.0%), three of five (60.0%), two of four (50.0%) and one of five (20.0%) studies respectively, for PRP group. Various clinical outcomes, such as IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score, knee anteroposterior and rotational laxity, range of motion and VAS, could not be improved with PRP application. The PRP is associated with very limited role in improving knee outcomes following ACLR, and there is no indication for PRP procedures in ACLR at this stage.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionPlatelet-Rich PlasmaHumansKnee JointRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnterior cruciate ligamentClinical outcomeImage evaluationPlatelet-rich plasmaRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID36056588
PMCPMC9531067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.