SynthesisSystematic reviews2022
Systematic review of the utility of the frailty index and frailty phenotype to predict all-cause mortality in older people.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of guideline recommendations for older and frail adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Age and ageing · 2024Pooled it
- Association between frailty and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy-systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of four frailty scores to predict adverse health events and mortality in people living with HIV aged 70 years and more (ANRS EP 66 SEPTAVIH study).HIV medicine · 2026Article
- Association of frailty index with sarcopenia: Mediation analysis of triglyceride-glucose-related indices: a cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- High frailty index scores predict mortality and changes in blood-based biomarkers in aging female mice.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Equitable Digital Frailty Screening for Marginalized Older Adults Using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview: Collaborative Development Guide and User Testing Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Oral Function, Frailty and Mortality in Older Adults: Evidence from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Lifestyle enrichment through social and cognitive engagement in later life: its associations with frailty trajectories and risk over 11 years.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Frailty index predicts the risk of 17 health outcomes in distinct ways: prospective findings from the Moli-sani Study.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Performance-Based and Self-Reported Frailty in Older Adults with or Without Fibromyalgia.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
- Self-reported sleep quality and frailty in middle-aged people living with HIV in an African setting: a pilot study.AIDS care · 2026Article
- Comparison of the frailty phenotype and frailty index for identifying vulnerable companion dogs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomarkers and Clinical Evaluation in the Detection of Frailty.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Frailty and comorbidities among young adult cancer survivors enrolled in an mHealth physical activity intervention trial.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Dietary trajectories over 21 years and frailty in Norwegian older adults: the Tromsø Study 1994-2016.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Frailty or resilience? Hazard-based and cumulative phenotype approaches to discerning signals of health inequality in medieval London.Science advances · 2024Article
- The intersection of frailty and metabolism.Cell metabolism · 2024Review
- Frailty prevalence in 42 European countries by age and gender: development of the SHARE Frailty Atlas for Europe.GeroScience · 2024Article
- The Association of Frailty and Neighborhood Disadvantage with Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations in Older Adults.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Observational
- Frailty predicts all-cause and cause-specific mortality among older adults in Austria: 8-year mortality follow-up of the Austrian Health Interview Survey (ATHIS 2014).BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines for healthcare of community-dwelling older people advocate screening for frailty to predict adverse health outcomes, but there is no consensus on the optimum instrument to use in such settings. The objective of this systematic review of population studies was to compare the ability of the frailty index (FI) and frailty phenotype (FP) instruments to predict all-cause mortality in older people.
methodsStudies published before 27 July 2022 were identified using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL databases. The eligibility criteria were population-based prospective studies of community-dwelling older adults (aged 65 years or older) and evaluation of both the FI and FP for prediction of all-cause mortality. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network's Methodology checklist was used to assess study quality. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) were compared, and the proportions of included studies that achieved acceptable discriminatory power (AUC>0.7) were calculated for each frailty instrument. The results were stratified by the use of continuous or categorical formats of each instrument. The review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA and SWiM guidelines.
resultsAmong 8 studies (range: 909 to 7713 participants), both FI and FP had comparable predictive power for all-cause mortality. The AUC values ranged from 0.66 to 0.84 for FI continuous, 0.60 to 0.80 for FI categorical, 0.63 to 0.80 for FP continuous and 0.57 to 0.79 for FP categorical. The proportion of studies achieving acceptable discriminatory power were 75%, 50%, 63%, and 50%, respectively. The predictive ability of each frailty instrument was unaltered by the number of included items.
conclusionsDespite differences in their content, both the FI and FP instruments had modest but comparable ability to predict all-cause mortality. The use of continuous rather than categorical formats in either instrument enhanced their ability to predict all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.