Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056409›Full record

ReviewChinese neurosurgical journal2022

Dexamethasone and compliance affect TTFields efficacy to glioblastoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shupeng Li, Jiawei Dong, Xinyu Wang, Xiangqi Meng, Chuanlu Jiang, Jinquan Cai

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese neurosurgical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shupeng Li *Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Jiawei Dong *Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Xinyu WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Xiangqi MengDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Chuanlu JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Jinquan CaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China. caijinquan666777@126.com.
Harbin Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

Central Government Supporting Local University Reform and Development Fund for Excellent Youth Talents 0202-300011190006China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2019M660074China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2020T130157Harbin Medical University Scientific Research Innovation Fund YJSCX2020-38HYDHeilongjiang Provincial Key R & D Project GA21C002Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation LBH-TZ2113Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation LBH-Z19029National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972817National Natural Science Foundation of China 82003022National Natural Science Foundation of China 82073298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TTFields is a novel treating modality of glioblastoma (GBM) which can significantly prolong the overall survival (OS) of newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma. Some researchers have revealed that a variety of factors can affect the efficacy of TTFields. So, we review the available literature about the influencing factors on efficacy of TTFields and then choose two experimentally supported factors: the dose of dexamethasone and compliance of TTFields to perform a meta-analysis. The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library are searched. Five articles are identified between 2014 and 2017. Three articles are about the compliance of TTFields. Two articles are about the dose of dexamethasone. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) is used as an assessment tool to evaluate the methodological quality of all included trials. The scale's range varies from 0 to 9 stars. According to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, articles are graded in six items to evaluate the risk of bias. Two reviewers rate the studies independently and the final decision is reached by consensus.Our data shows that the median OS is conspicuously longer in the TTFields group in which the dose of dexamethasone is ≤ 4.1 mg, WMD = 9.23 [95% CI 5.69-12.78]; P < 0.05). And the patients whose compliance of TTFields treatment ≥ 75% (≥ 18 h per day) have a significant lower overall survival risk than the patients whose compliance of TTFields treatment < 75% (HR = 0.57 [95% CI 0.46-0.70]; P < 0.00001).TTFields is a safe and efficient novel treatment modality. The dose of dexamethasone ≤ 4.1 mg of TTFields treatment and the compliance of TTFields treatment ≥ 75%, ≥ 18 h per day are beneficial to the prognosis of the glioblastoma patients.

Indexed as

ComplianceDexamethasoneGlioblastomaMeta-analysisTTFields

Identifiers

PMID36056409
PMCPMC9440597
OpenAlexW4294543078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.