Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056389›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2022

Improving medical student recruitment into neurosurgery through teaching reform.

Jun Shen, Lili Yuan, Ruixiang Ge, Xuefei Shao, Xiaochun Jiang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun Shen *Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (YiJiShan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Anhui Province, 241001, Wuhu City, People's Republic of China. shenyuanziyan@163.com.
Lili Yuan *Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (YiJiShan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu City, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China.
Ruixiang Ge *Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (YiJiShan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Anhui Province, 241001, Wuhu City, People's Republic of China.
Xuefei ShaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (YiJiShan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Anhui Province, 241001, Wuhu City, People's Republic of China.
Xiaochun JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (YiJiShan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Anhui Province, 241001, Wuhu City, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Teaching and Research Project of Anhui Provincial Department of Educatio 2021jyxm1636, 2021jyxm1639The Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project of Wannan Medical College 2020jyxm87, 2020jyxm79
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to determine whether a combination of case-based learning (CBL) and problem-based learning (PBL) methods in teaching can improve the academic performance and recruitment of medical students for neurosurgery.

methodsFour classes of fourth-year medical students were randomly divided into two groups. The traditional model group received the traditional teaching method, and the CBL-PBL group received the combined teaching methods of CBL and PBL. After the courses, the differences between the two groups in self-perceived competence, satisfaction with the course, post-class test scores, and clinical practice abilities were compared, and the proportions of neurosurgery major selection in pre- and post-curriculum between the two groups were also analyzed.

resultsSelf-perceived competence, post-class test scores, and clinical practice abilities in the CBL-PBL group were better than those in the traditional model group. The students in the CBL-PBL group showed a higher degree of satisfaction with the course than those in the traditional model group (χ2 = 12.03, P = 0.007). At the end of the semester, the proportion of students who chose neurosurgery majors in the CBL-PBL group was 13.3%, more than the 3.4% in the traditional model group (χ2 = 3.93, P = 0.048).

conclusionCompared with the traditional teaching method, the CBL and PBL integrated method is more effective for improving the performance of medical students and enhancing their clinical capabilities in neurosurgery teaching. The CBL-PBL method effectively improved students' interests in neurosurgery, potentially contributing to increasing medical student recruitment into neurosurgery.

Indexed as

NeurosurgeryStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansProblem-Based LearningSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingCase-based learningNeurosurgeryProblem-based learningTraditional teaching method

Identifiers

PMID36056389
PMCPMC9440581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.