ArticleBMC anesthesiology2022
Assessment of the effects of dexmedetomidine on outcomes of traumatic brain injury using propensity score analysis.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07406555 (Differences in C-Reactive Protein Levels Between Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Receiving Dexmedetomidine and Those Not Receiving Dexmedetomidine Undergoing Craniotomy at Prof. Dr. Margono Soekarjo Regional General Hospital, Purwokerto), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Differences in C-Reactive Protein Levels Between Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Receiving Dexmedetomidine and Those Not Receiving Dexmedetomidine Undergoing Craniotomy at Prof. Dr. Margono Soekarjo Regional General Hospital, Purwokerto
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of dexmedetomidine in brain injury: a systematic review.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Sex-Specific Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cell Function After Traumatic Brain Injury in Juvenile Mice.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Analgesia, Sedation, and Neuromuscular Blockade in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Secondary Analysis of the "Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial" (ADAPT).Neurocritical care · 2025Observational
- Resuscitation and Initial Management After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Questions for the On-Call Shift.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Association of early dexmedetomidine exposure with brain injury biomarker levels following moderate - Severe traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI study.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and propofol impact on epilepsy-related mortality in the ICU: insights from the MIMIC-IV database.BMC neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDexmedetomidine was found to be protective against traumatic brain injury (TBI) in animal studies and safe for use in previous clinical studies, but whether it improves TBI patient survival remains to be determined. We sought to answer this question by analyzing data from the MIMIC clinical database.
methodsData for TBI patients from the MIMIC III and MIMIC IV databases were extracted and divided into a dexmedetomidine group and a control group. In the former group, dexmedetomidine was used for sedation, while in the latter, it was not used. Parameters including patient age, the Acute Physiology score III, the Glasgow Coma Scale, other sedatives used, and pupillary response within 24 h were employed in propensity score matching to achieve a balance between groups for further analysis. In-hospital survival and 6-month survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared by log-rank test. Cox regression was used repeatedly for the univariate analysis, the multivariate analysis, the propensity score-matched analysis, and the inverse probability of treatment weighted analysis of survival data. Meanwhile, the influences of hypotension, bradycardia, infection, and seizure on outcome were also analyzed.
resultsDifferent types of survival analyses demonstrated the same trend. Dexmedetomidine significantly improved TBI patient survival. It caused no more incidents of hypotension, infection, and seizure. Hypotension was not correlated with in-hospital mortality, but was significantly correlated with 6-month mortality.
conclusionsDexmedetomidine may improve the survival of TBI patients. It should be used with careful avoidance of hypotension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.