Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056244›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023

Deep brain stimulation in the ALIC-BNST region targeting the bed nucleus of stria terminalis in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: effects on cognition after 12 months.

Johanna Philipson, Matilda Naesstrom, Johannes D Johansson, Marwan Hariz, Patric Blomstedt, Marjan Jahanshahi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incidental resolution of pedophilia in a patient undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): a case report and long-term follow-up.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johanna PhilipsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden. johanna.philipson@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7063-9710
Matilda NaesstromDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Johannes D JohanssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Marwan HarizDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden.
Patric BlomstedtDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden.
Marjan JahanshahiUnit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 33 Queen Square, London, UK.
Umeå University · SENational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBLinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive effects 12 months after Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Bed Nucleus of Stria Terminalis (BNST) in patients with refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD).

methodsEight patients (5 female; mean ± SD age 36 ± 15) with OCD were included. A neuropsychological test battery covering verbal and spatial episodic memory, executive function, and attention was administered preoperatively and 12 months after surgery. Medical records were used as a source for descriptive data to probe for any changes not covered by standardized checklists and the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the primary outcome measure.

resultsAt 12 months, seven patients showed response to DBS: three were full responders (i.e., Y-BOCS ≥ 35% improvement), and four were partial responders (Y-BOCS 25-34% improvement). Relative to baseline, there was a slight decline on visuo-spatial learning (p = 0.027), and improved performance on the Color-Word Interference inhibition/switching subtest (p = 0.041), suggesting improvement in cognitive flexibility.

conclusionsDBS in the BNST for treatment refractory OCD generates very few adverse cognitive effects and improves cognitive flexibility after 12 months of stimulation. The improvement in Y-BOCS and the absence of major cognitive side effects support the BNST as a potential target for DBS in severe OCD.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationObsessive-Compulsive DisorderSeptal NucleiAdultCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBed nucleus of stria terminalis, BNSTCognitionDeep brain stimulation, DBSObsessive–compulsive disorder, OCD

Identifiers

PMID36056244
PMCPMC10140080
OpenAlexW4294311584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.