Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056194›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2022

Clustering analysis of geriatric and acute characteristics in a cohort of very old patients on admission to ICU.

Oded Mousai, Lola Tafoureau, Tamar Yovell, Hans Flaatten, Bertrand Guidet, Christian Jung, Dylan de Lange, Susannah Leaver, Wojciech Szczeklik, Jesper Fjolner and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Predictive value of stress-induced hyperglycemia on 28 d risk of all-cause death in intensive care patients].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Oded Mousai *School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel.
Lola Tafoureau *School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tamar Yovell *School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hans FlaattenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Bertrand GuidetAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France.
Christian JungDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Dylan de LangeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Susannah LeaverGeneral Intensive Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Wojciech SzczeklikCenter for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Jesper FjolnerDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Peter Vernon van HeerdenGeneral Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University and Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Leo JoskowiczSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michael BeilDepartment of Medical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University and Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gal HyamsSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel.
Sigal SviriDepartment of Medical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University and Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. sigals@hadassah.org.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9213-0245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe biological and functional heterogeneity in very old patients constitutes a major challenge to prognostication and patient management in intensive care units (ICUs). In addition to the characteristics of acute diseases, geriatric conditions such as frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive impairment and functional disabilities were shown to influence outcome in that population. The goal of this study was to identify new and robust phenotypes based on the combination of these features to facilitate early outcome prediction.

methodsPatients aged 80 years old or older with and without limitations of life-sustaining treatment and with complete data were recruited from the VIP2 study for phenotyping and from the COVIP study for external validation. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and its sub-scores taken on admission to ICU as well as demographic and geriatric patient characteristics were subjected to clustering analysis. Phenotypes were identified after repeated bootstrapping and clustering runs.

resultsIn patients from the VIP2 study without limitations of life-sustaining treatment (n = 1977), ICU mortality was 12% and 30-day mortality 19%. Seven phenotypes with distinct profiles of acute and geriatric characteristics were identified in that cohort. Phenotype-specific mortality within 30 days ranged from 3 to 57%. Among the patients assigned to a phenotype with pronounced geriatric features and high SOFA scores, 50% died in ICU and 57% within 30 days. Mortality differences between phenotypes were confirmed in the COVIP study cohort (n = 280).

conclusionsPhenotyping of very old patients on admission to ICU revealed new phenotypes with different mortality and potential need for anticipatory intervention.

Indexed as

FrailtyIntensive Care UnitsCluster AnalysisCohort StudiesHospital MortalityHumansOrgan Dysfunction ScoresClustering analysisGeriatric patientsHeterogeneityIntensive carePhenotyping

Identifiers

PMID36056194
PMCPMC9439274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.