Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056153›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Bacterial ectosymbionts in cuticular organs chemically protect a beetle during molting stages.

Rebekka S Janke, Filip Kaftan, Sarah P Niehs, Kirstin Scherlach, Andre Rodrigues, Aleš Svatoš, Christian Hertweck, Martin Kaltenpoth, Laura V Flórez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Insect immunity in the Anthropocene.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. With a little help from my friends: the roles of microbial symbionts in insect populations and communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rebekka S JankeDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6972-200X
Filip KaftanDepartment of Insect Symbiosis, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Sarah P NiehsDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Natural Products Research and Infection Biology, HKI, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Kirstin ScherlachDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Natural Products Research and Infection Biology, HKI, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Andre RodriguesDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, 13506-900 SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-9362
Aleš SvatošResearch Group Mass Spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1032-7288
Christian HertweckDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Natural Products Research and Infection Biology, HKI, 07745, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-337X
Martin KaltenpothDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9450-0345
Laura V FlórezDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany. lvf@plen.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0761-3729
Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In invertebrates, the cuticle is the first and major protective barrier against predators and pathogen infections. While immune responses and behavioral defenses are also known to be important for insect protection, the potential of cuticle-associated microbial symbionts to aid in preventing pathogen entry during molting and throughout larval development remains unexplored. Here, we show that bacterial symbionts of the beetle Lagria villosa inhabit unusual dorsal invaginations of the insect cuticle, which remain open to the outer surface and persist throughout larval development. This specialized location enables the release of several symbiont cells and the associated protective compounds during molting. This facilitates ectosymbiont maintenance and extended defense during larval development against antagonistic fungi. One Burkholderia strain, which produces the antifungal compound lagriamide, dominates the community across all life stages, and removal of the community significantly impairs the survival probability of young larvae when exposed to different pathogenic fungi. We localize both the dominant bacterial strain and lagriamide on the surface of eggs, larvae, pupae, and on the inner surface of the molted cuticle (exuvia), supporting extended protection. These results highlight adaptations for effective defense of immature insects by cuticle-associated ectosymbionts, a potentially key advantage for a ground-dwelling insect when confronting pathogenic microbes.

Indexed as

BurkholderiaColeopteraAnimalsFungiInsectaLarvaMoltingPupa

Identifiers

PMID36056153
PMCPMC9666510
OpenAlexW4294316493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.